Back

BRIDGE: a barrier-informed Bayesian Risk prediction model for risk IDentification, trajectory Grouping, and profiling of non-adherencE to cardioprotective medicines in primary care

Koh, H. J. W.; Trin, C.; Ademi, Z.; Zomer, E.; Berkovic, D.; Cataldo Miranda, P.; Gibson, B.; Bell, J. S.; Ilomaki, J.; Liew, D.; Reid, C.; Lybrand, S.; Gasevic, D.; Earnest, A.; Gasevic, D.; Talic, S.

2026-04-22 pharmacology and therapeutics
10.64898/2026.04.21.26351387 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundNon-adherence to lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) affects up to half of patients and contributes substantially to preventable cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Existing measures, such as the proportion of days covered, provide cross-sectional summaries but fail to capture the dynamic patterns of adherence over time. Although group-based trajectory modelling identifies distinct longitudinal adherence patterns, no approach currently predicts trajectory membership prospectively while incorporating patient-reported barriers. We developed BRIDGE, a barrier-informed Bayesian model to predict adherence trajectories and identify their underlying drivers. MethodsBRIDGE incorporates patient-reported barriers as structured prior information within a Bayesian framework for adherence-trajectory prediction. The model was designed not only to estimate which patients are likely to follow different adherence trajectories, but also to generate clinically interpretable probability estimates that help explain why those trajectories may arise and what modifiable factors may be most relevant for intervention. ResultsBRIDGE achieved a macro AUROC of 0.809 (95% CI 0.806 to 0.813), comparable to random forest (0.815 (95% CI 0.812 to 0.819)) and XGBoost (0.821 (95% CI 0.818 to 0.824)), two widely used machine-learning benchmarks for structured clinical prediction. Calibration was superior to random forest (Brier score 0.530 vs 0.545; ), and performance was stable across six independent training runs (AUROC SD = 0.003). Incorporating barrier-informed priors improved accuracy by 3.5% and calibration by 5.5% compared to flat priors, showing that incorporation of patient-reported barriers added value beyond electronic medical record data alone. Four clinically distinct adherence trajectories were identified: gradual decline associated with treatment deprioritisation amid polypharmacy (10.4%), early discontinuation linked to asymptomatic risk dismissal (40.5%), rapid decline associated with intolerance (28.8%), and persistent adherence (20.2%). Counterfactual analysis identified trajectory-specific intervention levers. ConclusionsBRIDGE provides accurate and well-calibrated prediction of adherence trajectories while offering clinically actionable insights into their underlying drivers. By integrating patient-reported barriers with routine clinical data, the model supports targeted, mechanism-informed interventions at the point of prescribing to improve adherence to cardioprotective therapies. FundingMRFF CVD Mission Grant 2017451 Evidence before this studyWe searched PubMed and Scopus from database inception to December 2025 using the terms "medication adherence", "trajectory", "prediction model", "Bayesian", "lipid-lowering therapy", and "barriers", with no language restrictions. Group-based trajectory modelling has consistently identified three to five adherence patterns across cardiovascular cohorts; however, these applications have been descriptive rather than predictive. Machine-learning models for adherence prediction achieve moderate discrimination but treat adherence as a binary or continuous outcome, thereby overlooking the clinically meaningful heterogeneity captured by trajectory approaches. One prior study applied a Bayesian dynamic linear model to examine adherence-outcome associations, but it did not predict adherence trajectories or incorporate patient-reported barriers. To our knowledge, no published model integrates patient-reported barriers into trajectory prediction. Added value of this studyBRIDGE is, to our knowledge, the first model to incorporate patient-reported adherence barriers as hierarchical domain-informed priors within a Bayesian framework for trajectory prediction. Using 108 predictors derived from routine electronic medical records, the model achieves discrimination comparable to state-of-the-art machine-learning approaches while additionally providing uncertainty quantification, barrier-level interpretability, and counterfactual insights to inform intervention strategies. The identified trajectories differed not only in adherence level but also in switching behaviour, drug-class evolution, and medication burden, suggesting distinct underlying mechanisms of non-adherence that may require tailored clinical responses. Implications of all the available evidenceEach adherence trajectory implies a distinct intervention target: asymptomatic risk communication for early discontinuers (40.5% of patients), proactive tolerability management for rapid decliners, medication simplification for patients with gradual decline associated with polypharmacy, and maintenance support for persistent adherers. By integrating routinely collected clinical data with patient-reported barriers, BRIDGE can be deployed within existing primary care EMR infrastructure to generate actionable, trajectory and patient--specific recommendations at the point of prescribing, helping to bridge the gap between adherence measurement and targeted adherence management.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
2
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
3
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.9%
6
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.3%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
9
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
10
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.1%
12
BioData Mining
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
13
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
16
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.5%
18
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
20
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
21
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.1%
22
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
23
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
24
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
25
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
26
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
27
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
28
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
29
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
30
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%