Back

Multimodal MRI and Machine Learning Uncovers Distinct Progression Patterns in Friedreich Ataxia

Saha, S.; Georgiou-Karistianis, N.; Teo, V.; Szmulewicz, D. J.; Strike, L. T.; Franca, M. C.; Rezende, T. J.; Harding, I. H.

2026-04-22 neurology
10.64898/2026.04.21.26351375 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Friedreich ataxia (FRDA) is a rare neurodegenerative disorder with substantial heterogeneity in clinical presentation and progression, complicating prognosis and trial design. Neuroimaging offers objective biomarkers to track disease evolution, yet variability in progression patterns remains poorly understood. Objective To identify biologically meaningful FRDA progression subtypes using longitudinal multimodal MRI and assess their associations with demographic, genetic, and clinical factors. Methods Longitudinal structural and diffusion MRI data from 54 FRDA and 57 controls were analysed. Annualised progression rates of macrostructural (volumetric) and microstructural (diffusion) features across cerebellum, brainstem, and spinal cord regions were clustered using Gaussian Mixture Models. Cluster robustness was assessed using per-cluster Jaccard similarity and other validation metrics. Random Forest classification examined predictors of cluster membership. Results Three reproducible clusters/subtypes emerged: micro-dominant/dual progression, characterised by widespread microstructural deterioration with modest volumetric decline; macro-dominant, marked by pronounced volumetric decline with minimal microstructural change; and minimal/no progression, showing negligible change in all measures. FRDA participants predominated in the first two clusters. Random Forest prediction of cluster membership using clinical and demographic variables identified length of the trinucleotide repeat expansion in the FXN gene as key predictor. Conclusions Data-driven clustering of longitudinal MRI identified distinct FRDA subtypes with unique co-progression patterns, underscoring genetic burden as a key driver. Recognising such heterogeneity can improve patient stratification, enable personalised monitoring, and guide targeted therapeutic strategies. Future studies should validate these subtypes in larger, more diverse cohorts and integrate additional biomarkers for enhanced precision.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.9%
2
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.1%
3
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.9%
4
Movement Disorders
62 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.8%
5
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
8.1%
7
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
8
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
9
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
10
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.0%
11
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
12
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
13
Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
14
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
15
Epilepsia
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
16
Neurology Genetics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
17
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.9%
19
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
20
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
21
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%