Back

Pain across the lifespan: global and regional reference curves from 6.1 million individuals in 118 countries

Fillingim, M.; Tanguay-Sabourin, C.; Neuert, L.; Zare, A.; Norman, J.; Guglietti, G. V.; Hobeika, L.; Ayorinde, A.; Salimzadeh, A.; Jamshidi, A.-r.; Tehrani-Banihashemi, A.; Olaya, B.; Longo Mbenza, B.; Oladeji, B.; Penninx, B.; Paudyal, B.; de Melo, C.; Berna-Renella, C.; Humberg, C.; Pascal, C.-P.; Smith, E.; VanDenKerkhof, E.; Giltay, E. J.; Garcia-Esquinas, E.; Parlindungan, F.; Abbasi, F. Q.; Rodriguez Artalejo, F.; Jones, G. T.; Slade, G.; Bouziri, H.; Flor, H.; Iso, H.; Gilron, I.; Uthman, I.; Pelaez-Ballestas, I.; Devengi Nzambi, J.-P.; Ayuso-Mateos, J. L.; Haro, J. M.; Wager, J.; Barc

2026-05-05 public and global health
10.64898/2026.04.21.26351327 medRxiv
Show abstract

Pain is the leading cause of disability worldwide, yet no population-based reference exists against which individual cohorts, clinical populations, or countries can be benchmarked. Here, we harmonised individual-level self-reported pain data from 6,075,021 participants across 894 population-based data sources in 118 countries to establish global reference trajectories of pain across the lifespan, implemented in an open-access benchmarking platform. Pain prevalence ranged from 2.5% for facial pain to 45.0% for back pain, was consistently higher in women across all eleven anatomical sites (risk ratio range 1.09 to 1.83), and increased most steeply before age 55 years. Contrary to existing estimates that generally project higher prevalence of pain conditions in higher Human Development Index (HDI) regions, we found that individuals in the lowest HDI countries experienced nearly twice the late-life prevalence of any bodily pain compared with those in the highest (risk difference 31.8 percentage points). Globally, 18.3% of site-specific pain burden was attributable to three modifiable risk factors (smoking, obesity, and low income) but this varied from 12.6% in sub-Saharan Africa to 27.1% in eastern Europe, indicating that the drivers of pain in lower-HDI settings remain poorly characterised.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 2%
25.7%
2
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
3
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.4%
4
Pain
70 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 17%
4.9%
6
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
8
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 8%
3.3%
9
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.3%
10
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.5%
12
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
13
The Journal of Pain
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
14
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
15
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
16
Cell Research
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
17
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
18
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.7%
19
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.7%
20
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
21
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
22
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
23
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 49%
0.5%