Back

Cross-feeding enables robust coexistence between four bacterial species

Sulheim, S.; Teixeira, M.; Ulrich, E.; Gillon, A.; Testa, S.; Padmanabha, P.; Machado, D.; Mitri, S.

2026-04-21 microbiology
10.64898/2026.04.20.719729 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AbstractMicrobial diversity is often assumed to be limited by the number of available resources, yet many communities persist well beyond that expectation. Understanding the mechanisms that enable such coexistence remains a central question in microbial ecology. Here, using a four-species bacterial consortium, we asked whether coexistence can emerge from interactions between species rather than from the external environment alone. Across 31 simple nutrient conditions, including 16 single-resource environments, all four species persisted and repeatedly reached stable coexistence. We then chose 27 additional conditions to further probe the boundaries of coexistence by varying resource concentrations, temporal dynamics, nutrient complexity and relief of auxotrophy-associated dependencies, and only observed the extinction of one species in one of these conditions. Although the community composition in each environment was largely shaped by species fitness on the supplied resources, experimental assays and consumer-resource modeling showed that the coexistence was not explained by resource supply, but rather by cross-feeding and niche partitioning of metabolic byproducts. These metabolic interactions were strong enough to sustain coexistence even for species unable to use the supplied resources directly. Furthermore, robust coexistence across environments appears to be an emergent property of microbial communities, ingrained in members metabolic byproduct profiles and niche differences. Our findings demonstrate how microbes can increase the chemical complexity of their environment sufficiently to maintain coexistence well beyond what is expected from external resource supply. SignificanceUnderstanding the drivers of microbial diversity is essential for managing natural ecosystems and designing synthetic microbiomes. This study challenges the conventional application of the competitive exclusion principle, demonstrating that a four-species consortium can coexist across 31 chemically and metabolically diverse one- and two-carbon source environments. By systematically testing and ruling out alternative stabilizing mechanisms, we show that co-existence is an emergent property of the consortium, sustained by metabolic cross-feeding and niche partitioning. Guided by computational models, we identify hallmarks of robust co-existence in simple environments, including high variance in resource affinities and growth on partner-derived metabolites. Our work demonstrates how microbes modify their environment to sustain high diversity and provides principles for designing synthetic microbiomes that persist across environments.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 3%
14.5%
2
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
3
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 1%
8.5%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.4%
5
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.4%
6
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 6%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
8
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.9%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 16%
4.9%
10
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.9%
11
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.4%
12
Cell Host & Microbe
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
13
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 19%
2.6%
14
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.9%
15
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.7%
16
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.3%
17
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.0%
18
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
19
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
21
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
22
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
23
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
24
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.5%
25
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.5%
26
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
27
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.5%