Back

Assessing the affinity spectrum of an antigen-specific memory B cell repertoire by inverted ImmunoSpot

Hoormann, M. J.; Becza, N.; Yao, L.; Kuerten, S.; Tary-Lehmann, M.; Sautto, G. A.; Lehmann, P. v.; Kirchenbaum, G. A.

2026-04-23 immunology
10.64898/2026.04.20.719720 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The biological efficacy of an antibody is largely defined by its affinity. Moreover, because the binding affinity of an antibody can span orders of magnitude, each antigen-specific B cell would not be expected to contribute equally to humoral defense: high-affinity antibodies are likely to possess increased potency in comparison to those with lower affinities. Hence, assessing the affinity spectrum of a persons antigen-specific B cell repertoire would provide valuable information on their immune competence. Currently, cloning and expression of large numbers of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) per test subject would be required to gain such insights, but this is impractical in the context of large-scale immune monitoring efforts. Here, we introduce a variant of the B cell ImmunoSpot assay that can simultaneously assess the relative affinity distribution of hundreds of individual B cells in a test sample. Additionally, we also demonstrated its suitability for high-throughput assay workflows that require minimal labor and exploit machine-assisted image analysis software tools. Specifically, as proof of principle, we verified that B cell hybridomas secreting mAbs of different affinities for the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein could readily be distinguished through simple titration of the soluble antigen detection probe. Furthermore, using this assay methodology we provide evidence for affinity maturation within the Spike-specific memory B cell repertoire following a second COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. Collectively, we introduce a high-throughput suitable and scalable methodology with the potential of filling a major gap in the immune monitoring field: characterizing the affinity distribution of antigen-specific B cells in large study cohorts.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
14.3%
2
Antibody Therapeutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
3
mAbs
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
European Journal of Immunology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.3%
6
The Journal of Immunology
146 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
7
Cytometry Part A
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
8
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.3%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 38%
4.0%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.0%
11
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 21%
2.1%
12
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.9%
13
Cellular & Molecular Immunology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 35%
1.5%
15
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.3%
16
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
17
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.1%
18
Immunity
58 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
19
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
20
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
22
Science Immunology
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
npj Vaccines
62 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
24
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
25
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.7%
28
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
29
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
30
Nature Immunology
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%