Back

Computational Drug Repurposing Targeting LuxS-Mediated Quorum Sensing in Fusobacterium nucleatum: A Virtual Screening and Molecular Dynamics Approach

Cedeno, K.; De Leon, D.; Chiari, M.

2026-04-21 microbiology
10.64898/2026.04.20.719701 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Fusobacterium nucleatum is an anaerobic bacterium strongly associated with the development and progression of colorectal cancer (CRC). Its pathogenic mechanisms involve the LuxS/AI-2 quorum sensing (QS) system, which regulates biofilm formation, virulence factor expression, and host immune evasion. Targeting LuxS represents a promising anti-virulence strategy that could disrupt bacterial communication without inducing selective pressure for antibiotic resistance. In this study, we employed a computational drug repurposing pipeline to identify FDA-approved drugs capable of inhibiting the LuxS enzyme in F. nucleatum. We performed structure-based virtual screening of 9,466 compounds from DrugBank using AutoDock Vina against the AlphaFold-predicted LuxS structure (UniProt: A0A133NIU3). From 1,082 initial hits (binding energy [&le;] - 7.0 kcal/mol), we applied ADMET filtering and composite scoring to select the top 5 candidates. Molecular dynamics simulations (10 ns each) using OpenMM with the AMBER14 force field confirmed the stability of all five protein-ligand complexes (RMSD < 2.0 [A]). The most promising candidates include Tubocurarine ({Delta}G = -16.97 kcal/mol, RMSD = 1.87 [A]), Docetaxel ({Delta}G = -13.22 kcal/mol, RMSD = 1.81 [A]), Metyrosine ({Delta}G = -13.78 kcal/mol, RMSD = 1.97 [A]), and Ergometrine ({Delta}G = -13.22 kcal/mol, RMSD = 1.92 [A]). These results constitute an exploratory computational basis that requires subsequent experimental validation through in vitro and in vivo assays, and provide candidates for testing as anti-quorum sensing agents against F. nucleatum, with potential implications for CRC prevention and treatment.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
20.0%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 13%
7.0%
3
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 23%
3.8%
5
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 11%
3.2%
7
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.7%
8
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.7%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.1%
10
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
50% of probability mass above
11
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.9%
13
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
14
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.5%
15
Communications Chemistry
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
16
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
17
Molecules
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
19
ACS Infectious Diseases
74 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
20
RSC Advances
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
68 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
23
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
24
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
Science China Life Sciences
26 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
26
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
28
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
29
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
30
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 43%
0.8%