Back

Temporal and Spectral Neural Complexity Reveal Graded Auditory Awareness

Liardi, A.; Bor, D.; Rosas, F. E.; Mediano, P. A. M. E.

2026-04-21 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.04.20.719685 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Recent advances have shown that the complexity of neural signals tracks global states of consciousness, such as wakefulness versus sleep. However, it is still unclear to what extent neural complexity reflects fine-grained changes in conscious content within the same global state. Here, we investigate how the complexity of brain signals is affected by increased perceptual clarity of a stimulus. To this end, we estimated neural signal complexity using Complexity via State-space Entropy Rate (CSER) to EEG recordings from an auditory discrimination task. In this paradigm, auditory stimuli were presented at varying signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), with higher SNRs corresponding to greater subjective audibility and perceptual clarity, enabling us to relate neural complexity to graded perceptual awareness within a constant global state of consciousness. Our results showed that, while broadband CSER remains constant across SNRs, its spectral decomposition displays frequency-specific effects, with higher SNRs associated with a decreased complexity in and {beta} bands, increased complexity in{delta} , and no significant changes in{gamma} . Additionally, a temporal investigation of CSER exhibited a significant increase in complexity with stimulus clarity, with deviations from baseline peaking approximately 30 ms before the ERP. Extending this analysis to pairs of brain regions, mutual information rate uncovered a sudden post-stimulus breakdown in long-range information transmission relative to baseline. Taken together, these results reveal that while aggregated complexity measures track global states of consciousness, time- and frequency-resolved information-theoretic measures can capture variations in perceptual awareness, demonstrating their sensitivity as estimators of the level of conscious experience.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
22.6%
2
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 1%
10.1%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 10%
8.4%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 11%
6.4%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.3%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.9%
8
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
9
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.1%
10
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
11
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
12
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
13
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.7%
14
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.7%
15
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.7%
16
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
17
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
18
Neuroscience of Consciousness
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
19
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.7%
23
Progress in Neurobiology
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%