Back

A Predictability Framework for Conservation Strategy: Empirical Evidence from Estuarine Biodiversity Forecasting

Fujiwara, M.

2026-04-23 ecology
10.64898/2026.04.20.719659 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Conservation biology increasingly relies on ecological forecasting, yet the biodiversity components most urgently targeted by conservation, such as rare species, local assemblages, and hotspot-defined communities, are often those whose dynamics are least predictable. Understanding how predictability varies across biodiversity is therefore essential for aligning management tools with their targets. This study tests whether predictability varies along three axes, how diversity is measured, the spatial scale of observation, and the temporal forecast horizon (which together govern the effective signal-to-noise ratio of ecological dynamics), and uses these patterns to inform conservation strategies. Using long-term monitoring data from seven estuaries along the Texas Gulf Coast, forecasting performance was evaluated for Hill diversity (q = 0, 1, 2) and population-level abundance of eight dominant taxa at local (bay) and regional (coastwide) scales across near-term (1-month) and long-term (12-month) horizons. Multiple time-series model classes were assessed within a rolling-origin cross-validation framework, with performance measured as improvement in root mean square error over a seasonal naive baseline. Forecasting performance increased consistently with Hill number order, reflecting reduced stochastic variation as dominant species are emphasized. The effects of spatial aggregation differed between systems. Aggregation generally improved performance for littoral assemblages but provided limited or no benefit for demersal assemblages, consistent with differences in how predictive signals are distributed across space. Forecast skill declined from 1-to 12-month horizons, with slower decay for dominance-weighted diversity and demersal assemblages than for rare-species-weighted richness and littoral assemblages. Environmental covariates provided limited near-term gains but became an increasingly important source of predictive information at longer horizons for a subset of demersal and crustacean targets. These results define a predictability landscape structured by diversity measurement, spatial scale, and forecast horizon. Three conservation domains, stochastic, transitional, and structured, emerge from this framework, each associated with distinct predictability regimes and management strategies. Aligning conservation approaches with the predictability properties of their targets provides a principled basis for determining when forecast-based management is informative and when precautionary approaches are more appropriate.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
2
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.6%
3
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
4
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
5
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.7%
6
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.7%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.2%
8
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.9%
9
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
10
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
11
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
12
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
13
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 51%
2.0%
15
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 37%
2.0%
17
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
18
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
19
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.7%
20
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
21
Conservation Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
22
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.3%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.2%
24
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
25
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.1%
26
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
27
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
28
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
29
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
30
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%