Back

UV photogrammetry for transparent and composite surfaces

Gentsch, G. J.; Platz, A.; Guo, M.; Harder, L.; Boettger, D.; Brehm, G.; Franke, C.; Stark, A. W.

2026-04-22 biophysics
10.64898/2026.04.20.719583 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Transparent and composite surfaces pose a fundamental challenge for stereo photogrammetry: optically smooth glass produces no detectable surface features under visible illumination, making three-dimensional reconstruction impossible without surface preparation. This excludes optical components such as lenses and cover glasses, composite assemblies, and semi-translucent biological specimens from non-contact geometric measurement. Here we show that coherent speckle illumination at 266 nm overcomes this limitation by exploiting wavelength-dependent scatter enhancement, generating sufficient backscattered signal on surfaces that are entirely invisible under visible illumination. We developed a multispectral stereo system and evaluated three illumination modalities under identical acquisition conditions. On transparent glass, both visible modalities produce complete reconstruction failure, recovering only non-transparent holder structures. Ultraviolet speckle illumination at 266 nm enables dense reconstruction of the same surfaces. We demonstrate recovery of an uncoated plano-convex lens with a fitted radius of 30.946 mm and point-cloud standard deviation of 106.5 {micro}m, defect detection on a transparent cover glass without surface preparation, and reconstruction of a semi-translucent biological specimen. On metrology-grade reference objects, ultraviolet speckle achieves a standard deviation of 116 {micro}m and completeness exceeding 93%, approaching the performance of optimised visible structured illumination. These results establish ultraviolet speckle photogrammetry as an enabling approach of optical metrology to otherwise uncooperative surfaces, with relevance to optical manufacturing inspection and biological surface analysis.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.6%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 13%
7.0%
4
Optics Express
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 32%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
Optica
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.4%
7
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
8
Optics Letters
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
9
The European Physical Journal Plus
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
10
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
IUCrJ
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
12
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
14
ACS Photonics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
15
Journal of Biomedical Optics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
16
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
17
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
18
HardwareX
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
19
Journal of Microscopy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
20
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%
21
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 47%
0.7%
24
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
25
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
26
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.5%
27
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.5%