Back

Ribosome biogenesis bottlenecks reveal vulnerabilities in cancer

Jiang, L.; Yu, Q.; Quinodoz, S. A.; Botello, J. F.; Alam, S.; Xia, J.; Trako, J.; Comi, T. J.; Abu-Alfa, A. A.; Wei, Y.; Kosmrlj, A.; Kang, Y.; brangwynne, C. P.

2026-04-21 cell biology
10.64898/2026.04.20.719509 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cell growth requires elevated protein synthesis, which depends on the production of ribosomes. Ribosome biogenesis is a complex, multi-step pathway in which newly transcribed precursor ribosomal RNA (rRNA) undergoes coordinated processing and assembly in the nucleolus to produce the small and large ribosomal subunits (SSU and LSU).1-3 Oncogene activation stimulates rRNA transcription and processing, giving rise to enlarged nucleoli that produce thousands of ribosomes every minute.4,5 However, efficient ribosome production requires tight coordination across numerous maturation steps, and it remains unclear if elevated rDNA transcription is proportionally converted into mature ribosomes, or whether imperfect coordination constrains the output yield. Here, we quantify pre-rRNA transcription (input) and compare it with newly-assembled cytoplasmic ribosomes (output), revealing that oncogene activation reduces the efficiency of ribosome production. Using a quantitative pulse-chase sequencing approach with mathematical modeling to resolve rRNA maturation kinetics, we found that oncogene activation creates late-stage processing bottlenecks, characterized by delayed precursor maturation and increased degradation. Perturbation of late-stage ribosome biogenesis factors preferentially impaired oncogene-driven cell growth, and limited tumor growth in mouse models, suggesting that these bottlenecks represent selective vulnerabilities in cancer, created by imbalanced biosynthetic flux. Together, these findings reveal that oncogene-driven ribosome production is imperfectly coordinated across maturation steps, and suggest that capacity limits in multi-step assembly pathways may be therapeutically exploitable in cancer and other diseases.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
18.5%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.8%
3
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 4%
6.8%
4
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 10%
4.8%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 16%
4.3%
6
Nature Cell Biology
99 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
7
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.6%
8
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
10
ACS Central Science
66 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.6%
11
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.1%
12
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
14
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.7%
15
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.7%
16
Cell Chemical Biology
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
17
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.5%
18
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
19
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.2%
20
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.1%
21
Nature Metabolism
56 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Nature Chemical Biology
104 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
26
Nature Chemistry
34 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
27
Nature Plants
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
Cell Discovery
54 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%