Back

When Noise Isnt Simply Noise: Deterministic Postural Drive During Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation (nGVS)

Rice, D.; Dakin, C. J.; Ewer, M.; Hannan, K. B.

2026-04-22 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.04.20.719310 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Age- and disease-related vestibular decline can cause dizziness and postural instability, motivating interventions such as noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation (nGVS). nGVS is commonly delivered at "subsensory" amplitudes and explained by stochastic resonance, yet because galvanic stimulation directly modulates vestibular afferents, even imperceptible currents may also exert deterministic effects on balance. This study examined whether low-amplitude nGVS (<1 mA), as typically used in stochastic resonance paradigms, directly influences postural behavior through stimulus-response coupling. Twenty healthy young adults stood on a force plate with feet together and eyes closed on either a rigid surface or 10-cm foam. In randomized order, they completed 300-second trials with band-limited (0-30 Hz), zero-mean nGVS at {+/-}0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.5, and 0.7 mA. Coupling between the stimulation waveform and mediolateral ground-reaction force was assessed using coherence and time-cumulant density. Mean coherence was significant mainly at higher amplitudes (0.5-0.7 mA) on both surfaces, whereas time-cumulant density identified significant time-locked vestibular-evoked response components at much lower amplitudes, down to 0.1 mA. These included an early response around 135-155 ms and a later, prominent response around 360-410 ms. Individually, significant coherence was common at 0.5-0.7 mA (15-19 of 20 participants), while cumulant-based responses appeared in some participants even at 0.1 mA. Responses were clearer on foam, consistent with greater vestibular reliance when somatosensory input is less reliable. Overall, low-amplitude nGVS can entrain postural output, suggesting that balance changes during "subsensory" stimulation may reflect both stochastic-resonance-like effects and deterministic vestibular drive, underscoring the need to quantify coupling alongside performance outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
18.9%
2
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.4%
4
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.9%
5
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.4%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.4%
7
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.8%
9
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.6%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.1%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 41%
1.7%
12
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.2%
15
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
16
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
17
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
18
Experimental Physiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
19
Pain
70 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
20
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
22
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
The Cerebellum
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
24
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
27
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 47%
0.7%