Back

Spatial scale of indentation explains shift in ratio between spinal cord gray and white matter stiffness

Neumann, O.; Surana, H. V.; Hintze, M.; Kuerten, S.; Franz, T.; Ramachandran, R. G.; Steinmann, P.; Budday, S.

2026-04-23 biophysics
10.64898/2026.04.20.719143 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The structural integrity of spinal cord tissue and the transmission of mechanical stimuli across the different levels of tissue microarchitecture and varying spatial scales of mechanical loading challenge experimental and computational efforts to accurately model, simulate and interpret tissue mechanics, leading to conflicting findings in existing literature. Here, we demonstrate that the bead size used in spherical indentation tests significantly affects the stiffness ratio of spinal cord gray to white matter, a dependence which we only observe on the transverse plane and not the coronal plane of the tissue. Our study reveals a shift in stiffness ratio such that for smaller spherical indenters gray matter is stiffer than white matter, while for larger indenters, white matter is stiffer than gray matter. The mean relative change from the 100 {micro}m bead to the 500 {micro}m bead differed between anatomical planes, with transverse sections showing a decrease in gray matter (-13.3%) and an increase in white matter stiffness (+26.9%), accompanied by a reduction in the gray-to-white matter stiffness ratio from 1.07 to 0.76, whereas coronal sections exhibited increases in both gray (+21.0%) and white matter (+33.8%), along with a change in the ratio from 0.99 to 1.14. These findings contribute to explaining previously contradictory results in the literature and underscore the relevance of spatial scales in mechanical characterization studies.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.5%
2
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
3
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
6
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.4%
7
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
8
Cytoskeleton
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
10
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.1%
11
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
12
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 46%
1.4%
15
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
16
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.0%
17
Nanoscale
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
18
Journal of Neurotrauma
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
19
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
20
Soft Matter
50 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
21
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
22
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.5%
23
The European Physical Journal E
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.5%
24
APL Bioengineering
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
25
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
26
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.5%