CPAP/BiPAP Compliance Improves Survival in LVAD Recipients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Carlquist, J.; Scott, S. S.; Wright, J. C.; Jianing, M.; Peng, J.; Mokadam, N. A.; Whitson, B. A.; Smith, S.
Show abstract
PurposeObstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common comorbidity in heart failure (HF) patients with prevalence increasing as HF severity worsens. While CPAP/BiPAP has been shown to reduce disease burden and mortality in the general HF population, it is unclear whether these benefits extend to patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). We sought to determine whether OSA affects long-term survival in newly implanted LVAD patients and whether CPAP/BiPAP treatment confers mortality benefits. MethodsThis single-center retrospective study included patients who underwent LVAD implantation between January 2007 and February 2022. Recipients were stratified by OSA status (OSA vs No-OSA), and those with OSA were further categorized based on CPAP/BiPAP compliance. Comparative statistics and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed, with log-rank tests used to compare groups and assess survival differences. A Cox proportional hazards model was conducted to evaluate the association between risk factors and survival among patients with OSA and No-OSA. ResultsBefore LVAD implantation, patients with OSA had higher body mass index, hypertension, and a higher rate of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement than those without OSA. OSA was not associated with increased postoperative complications. Although survival did not differ significantly between OSA and No-OSA patients (p=0.33), CPAP/BiPAP-compliant OSA patients had significantly better survival than noncompliant patients (p=0.0099). ConclusionsLVAD patients with OSA who consistently use CPAP/BiPAP have better survival than those who do not. CPAP/BiPAP is a simple, low-risk treatment that can reduce mortality in this population. Therefore, increased perioperative screening for OSA should be considered for patients receiving LVADs. Multicenter studies are needed to confirm our findings further.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- An International Longitudinal Natural History Study of Danon Disease Patients: Unique Cardiac Trajectories Identified Based on Sex and Heart Failure Outcomes 94%
- Prognostic Value of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Predicting Long-term Mortality after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) 94%
- The Effect of Medical Therapy on Reducing the Risk of Pacing Induced Cardiomyopathy 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- High Initial Heart Rate Score is an Independent Predictor of New Atrial High-Rate Episodes in Pacemaker Patients with Sinus Node Dysfunction 94%
- Competing Risks in Patients with Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverters Defibrillators: Global Electrical Heterogeneity and Clinical Outcomes (GEHCO) Study 94%
- Early Experience with Ivabradine for Focal Atrial Tachycardia in Pediatric Patients with Congenital Heart Disease 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Obesity Modifies Clinical Outcomes of Right Ventricular Dysfunction 95%
- Impact of Advanced Therapy Centers on Characteristics and Outcomes of Heart Failure Admissions 94%
- Biomarkers of RV dysfunction in HFrEF identified by direct tissue proteomics: extracellular proteins fibromodulin and fibulin-5 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Advanced Hemodynamic and Cluster Analysis for Identifying Novel RV function subphenotypes in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension 93%
- Right ventricular pressure-strain relationship-derived myocardial work reflects contractility: validation with invasive pressure-volume analysis 91%
- Alterations in Sarcopenia Index are Associated with Inflammation, Gut and Oral Microbiota among Heart Failure, Left Ventricular Assist Device and Heart Transplant Patients 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.