Sexual Function and Clitoral Anatomy after Vaginal Surgery with and without Midurethral Sling

STRUCTURED ABSTRACTO_ST_ABSImportanceC_ST_ABSSexual dysfunction can occur after midurethral sling (MUS) and transvaginal prolapse surgery. It remains unclear whether these procedures impact the clitoris, despite its role in sexual function and proximity to the MUS and vagina. ObjectivesTo compare postoperative sexual function and clitoral features by MUS and vaginal surgery approach after transvaginal prolapse repair with/without concomitant MUS. DesignCross-sectional ancillary study of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and sexual function data from the Defining Mechanisms of Anterior Vaginal Wall Descent study. SettingEight clinical sites in the US Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Participants: 88 women with uterovaginal prolapse who underwent vaginal mesh hysteropexy or vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension with/without MUS between 2013-2015. Data were analyzed between September 2021-June 2023. ExposuresBetween June 2014-May 2018, participants underwent pelvic MRI 30-42 months after surgery, or earlier if reoperation was desired. Sexual activity and function at baseline and 24-48-month follow-up were evaluated using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-Revised (PISQ-IR). Clitoral features were obtained from postoperative MRI-based 3-dimensional models. Main Outcomes and MeasuresPISQ-IR scores and clitoral features (size, position). ResultsEighty-two women (median [range] age, 65 [47-79] years) were analyzed: 45 MUS (22 hysteropexy, 23 hysterectomy) and 37 No-MUS (19 hysteropexy, 18 hysterectomy). Postoperatively, 25 MUS, 12 No-MUS, 20 hysteropexy, and 17 hysterectomy patients were sexually active (SA). Overall, within the MUS and vaginal surgery groups, sexual function remained unchanged or improved (most PISQ-IR change from baseline scores were [≥]0) among SA and NSA women. Among SA women after surgery, the MUS group (vs No-MUS) had a poorer PISQ-IR arousal/orgasm (SA-AO) score (median, 3.5 vs 4.3; P=.02). The hysteropexy group (vs hysterectomy) had less improvement in PISQ-IR SA-AO score (median, 0.0 vs 0.3; P=.01). Women with MUS (vs without) had a smaller clitoral glans thickness (median, 9.0 mm vs 10.0 mm; P=.008) and clitoral body volume (median, 2783.5 mm3 vs 3587.4 mm3; P=.01). Conclusions and RelevanceSA women with MUS (vs without) or hysteropexy (vs hysterectomy) experienced poorer postoperative sexual function. MUS was linked to a smaller clitoris. Future studies should explore surgery-induced changes in clitoral anatomy and sexual function. KEY POINTSO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSHow do sexual function and clitoral anatomy differ by midurethral sling placement and vaginal surgery approach? FindingsThis cross-sectional study compared patient-reported sexual function outcomes and 30-42-month postoperative magnetic resonance imaging-based 3-dimensional clitoral models of 82 women after vaginal prolapse surgery with or without concomitant midurethral sling. Midurethral sling (vs no sling) and vaginal mesh hysteropexy (vs vaginal hysterectomy) were associated with poorer postoperative sexual function outcomes. Additionally, midurethral sling was associated with a smaller clitoral glans and body. MeaningMidurethral sling and vaginal mesh hysteropexy were associated with, and may adversely alter, postoperative sexual function and/or clitoral anatomy. VISUAL ABSTRACT/PROMOTIONAL IMAGE O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=113 SRC="FIGDIR/small/26351291v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (33K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@904497org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@187514aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@e9e799org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@640f1a_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG