Back

Peer support boosted Hepatitis C treatment access among marginalised populations in England: A Bayesian causal factor analysis.

Schmidt, C.; Samartsidis, P.; Seaman, S.; Emmanouil, B.; Foster, G.; Reid, L.; Smith, S.; De Angelis, D.

2026-04-22 health policy
10.64898/2026.04.20.26351261 medRxiv
Show abstract

To minimise health disparities, equitable access to medical treatment is paramount. In a pioneering intervention, National Health Service Englands Hepatitis C virus (HCV) programme has implemented country-wide peer support to boost treatment access. Peer support workers (peers) are individuals with relevant lived experience, who promote testing and treatment in marginalised populations underserved by traditional health services. We evaluated the English peers intervention, exploiting its staggered rollout and rich surveillance data between June 2016 and May 2021. Peers increased HCV cases identified by 13{middle dot}9% (95% credible interval (95% CrI) [5{middle dot}3, 21{middle dot}7]), sustained viral responses by 8{middle dot}0% (95% CrI [-4{middle dot}4, 18{middle dot}6]), and drug services referrals by 8{middle dot}8% (95% CrI [-12{middle dot}5, 22{middle dot}6]). The interventions effectiveness was magnified during the first COVID-19 lockdown and individuals supported by peers typically belonged to populations with poor treatment access. Our findings indicate that peers can boost equity in treatment access on a national scale.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
2
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.2%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.4%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
5
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.7%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 25%
3.6%
7
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
9
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
10
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.9%
12
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Hepatology Communications
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
European Journal of Epidemiology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
15
Medical Decision Making
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
16
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
17
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
18
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
19
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.9%
20
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Nature Aging
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
23
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
25
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
26
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
International Journal of Drug Policy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
28
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
30
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%