Back

The burden of neurogenic orthostatic hypotension in patients with multiple system atrophy: a real-world study

Kmiecik, M. J.; O'Brien, L.; Szpyhulsky, M.; Iodice, V.; Freeman, R.; Jordan, J.; Biaggioni, I.; Kaufmann, H.; Vickery, R.; Miller, A.; Saunders, E.; Rushton, E.; Valle, L.; Norcliffe-Kaufmann, L.

2026-04-22 neurology
10.64898/2026.04.20.26351214 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAlthough neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (nOH) is a common and debilitating feature of multiple system atrophy (MSA), little is known about the burden of symptoms in the real world. ObjectivesTo design and conduct a cross-sectional community-based research survey targeting patients with MSA, with and without nOH. MethodsWe recruited patients with MSA to complete an anonymous online survey covering three core themes: 1) timely diagnosis, 2) nOH pharmacotherapy and refractory symptoms, and 3) confidence in physician knowledge. Responses were grouped by pre-specified diagnostic certainty levels. Relationships between symptoms, function, and pharmacotherapy were assessed using univariate and multivariate methods. ResultsWe analyzed 259 respondents with a self-reported diagnosis of MSA (age: M=64.38, SD=8.09 years; 44% female). In total, 42% also had a diagnosis nOH; 40% had symptoms highly suspicious of nOH, but no diagnosis; and 21% reported having never had their blood pressure measured in the standing position at a clinical visit. Treatment with a pressor agent was independently associated with the presence of other symptoms of autonomic failure. Each additional nOH symptom reported increased the odds of requiring pharmacotherapy by 18%. Yet, despite anti-hypotensive medication use, 97% of patients reported limitations in their ability to bathe, cook, or arise from a chair/bed with 76% needing caregiver support for refractory nOH symptoms. ConclusionsThis cross-sectional representative sample shows nOH is underrecognized and undertreated in MSA patients, leading to substantial functional limitations. It is our hope that these findings are leveraged for planning future trials and advocating for better treatments.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.0%
2
Movement Disorders
62 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.0%
3
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.0%
4
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.0%
5
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
7
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.5%
9
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.7%
10
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
11
The Cerebellum
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
14
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 64%
1.3%
16
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
17
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
21
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
22
SLEEP
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
23
Pediatrics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
24
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
25
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
26
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
27
Journal of Neurotrauma
27 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%