Back

Shared Strides: Operational feasibility of community-based biomechanics data collection in knee osteoarthritis

McCloskey, R. C.; Qualter, J. M.; Gruber, A.; Leapley, S.; Qiu, P.; Tian, Z.; Vincent, H. K.; Costello, K. E.

2026-04-29 orthopedics
10.64898/2026.04.20.26351135 medRxiv
Show abstract

Biomechanics studies using traditional optical motion capture have been limited by small, homogeneous sample sizes and a focus on single movements, restricting the ability to capture clinically relevant adaptations across daily tasks. These limitations are particularly consequential in heterogeneous musculoskeletal conditions such as knee osteoarthritis (OA), where variability in demographic and clinical characteristics necessitates large, representative samples to identify patient-specific biomechanical intervention targets. Markerless motion capture enables faster, high-throughput data collection and offers the potential for community-based assessments; however, its feasibility of use in clinical populations across diverse tasks remains unclear. This study evaluated the feasibility of community-based, high-throughput markerless biomechanics data collection in individuals with knee OA. Participants (n = 85) completed a series of activities of daily living using a portable markerless motion capture system deployed across two community-based and two on-campus sites. Feasibility was assessed using timing metrics related to research operations (transit, setup, calibration, breakdown), participant workflow (consent, questionnaires, motion capture), and task-specific durations. No significant differences in timing metrics were observed across sites despite logistical and operational challenges. These findings support the feasibility of using high-throughput, community-based markerless motion capture and suggest a viable pathway for addressing long-standing limitations in sample size and representativeness through scalable data collection workflows in biomechanics studies.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 11%
15.3%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 1%
15.3%
3
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.5%
4
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
5
Applied Sciences
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.7%
8
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
9
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
10
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 40%
1.8%
12
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
13
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
14
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
15
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
16
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
17
Arthritis & Rheumatology
33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
18
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
22
The Journal of Pain
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
25
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
27
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
28
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
29
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
30
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%