Shared Strides: Operational feasibility of community-based biomechanics data collection in knee osteoarthritis
McCloskey, R. C.; Qualter, J. M.; Gruber, A.; Leapley, S.; Qiu, P.; Tian, Z.; Vincent, H. K.; Costello, K. E.
Show abstract
Biomechanics studies using traditional optical motion capture have been limited by small, homogeneous sample sizes and a focus on single movements, restricting the ability to capture clinically relevant adaptations across daily tasks. These limitations are particularly consequential in heterogeneous musculoskeletal conditions such as knee osteoarthritis (OA), where variability in demographic and clinical characteristics necessitates large, representative samples to identify patient-specific biomechanical intervention targets. Markerless motion capture enables faster, high-throughput data collection and offers the potential for community-based assessments; however, its feasibility of use in clinical populations across diverse tasks remains unclear. This study evaluated the feasibility of community-based, high-throughput markerless biomechanics data collection in individuals with knee OA. Participants (n = 85) completed a series of activities of daily living using a portable markerless motion capture system deployed across two community-based and two on-campus sites. Feasibility was assessed using timing metrics related to research operations (transit, setup, calibration, breakdown), participant workflow (consent, questionnaires, motion capture), and task-specific durations. No significant differences in timing metrics were observed across sites despite logistical and operational challenges. These findings support the feasibility of using high-throughput, community-based markerless motion capture and suggest a viable pathway for addressing long-standing limitations in sample size and representativeness through scalable data collection workflows in biomechanics studies.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Experimental recommendations for estimating lower extremity loading based on joint and activity 95%
- Changes in foot progression angle during gait reduce the knee adduction moment and do not increase hip moments in individuals with knee osteoarthritis 95%
- Inter-session repeatability of markerless motion capture gait kinematics 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Biomechanical effects of adding an articulating toe joint to a passive foot prosthesis for incline and decline walking 94%
- Is Modular Control Related To Functional Outcomes In Individuals With Knee Osteoarthritis And Following Total Knee Arthroplasty? 94%
- Connecting real-world digital mobility assessment to clinical outcomes for regulatory and clinical endorsement – the Mobilise-D study protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and content validation of a questionnaire identifying patients’ functional priorities and abilities after hip or knee arthroplasty 93%
- Kinematics associated with treadmill walking in Rett Syndrome 93%
- Cardiorespiratory exercise and self-management early after stroke to increase daily physical activity: results from a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Biological, biomechanical, and pain sensitivity effects of walk-run in people with self-reported knee osteoarthritis 94%
- Differences in external loads of different pitch types in Chinese male college baseball players 92%
- Evaluation of 3D markerless motion capture accuracy using OpenPose with multiple video cameras 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Barriers and facilitators to implementing core osteoarthritis treatments in China: a mixed-method study 94%
- Comparative Computed Tomography with Stress Manoeuvres for Diagnosing Distal Isolated Tibiofibular Syndesmotic Injury in Acute Ankle Sprain: a Protocol for an Accuracy-Test Prospective Study. 92%
- Exploring Risk Factors for Comorbid Depression in Osteoarthritis: A Scoping Review Protocol 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.