Back

High-resolution disconnectome predicts outcome and response to thrombectomy in basilar artery occlusion

Authamayou, B.; Marnat, G.; Matsulevits, A.; Munsch, F.; Lavielle, A.; Courbin, N.; Foulon, C.; Chen, B.; Micard, E.; Gory, B.; L'Allinec, V.; Bourcier, R.; Naggara, O.; Lauze, E.; Boulouis, G.; Lapergue, B.; Eker, O.; Sibon, I. P.; Thiebaut de Schotten, M.; Tourdias, T.

2026-04-21 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.04.20.26350998 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAcute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) causes devastating strokes. Despite the benefit of endovascular treatment, the optimal management remains sometimes controversial, such as for patients with mild deficits, and would benefit from robust prognostic tools. Given the dense white matter networks within the posterior fossa, we tested whether quantifying disconnections from acute diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) could improve outcome prediction and responders to recanalization compared with conventional metrics. MethodsWe conducted a secondary analysis from a prospective multicenter stroke registry, including consecutive patients (2017-2024) with BAO and admission MRI. Ultra-high-resolution diffusion MRI was acquired in healthy participants to build normative tractograms with optimized posterior fossa quality. Patient infarcts delineated on DWI were projected onto these tractograms to estimate disconnected fiber volume. The primary outcome was 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-3 vs 4-6. Predictive performance of disconnected fiber volume was compared with baseline NIHSS, infarct volume, and posterior circulation ASPECTS (pc-ASPECTS) using logistic regressions and areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC). Ordinal regressions tested associations across the full mRS spectrum, stratified by recanalization status. Analyses were repeated in patients with NIHSS [&le;]10. ResultsAmong 201 patients (median age 70; NIHSS 10), 97 (48.3%) had poor outcome. Despite small median infarct volume (4.75 mL), disconnected fiber volume was substantial (median 25.15 mL). Disconnected fiber volume achieved an AUC of 0.84, outperforming NIHSS (0.67; p<0.0001), infarct volume (0.75; p=0.00059), and pc-ASPECTS (0.76; p=0.0127). Low disconnected fiber volume predicted better outcomes across the full mRS (OR=0.12 [95% CI, 0.065-0.204]) and greater benefit from successful recanalization (OR=0.33 [95% CI, 0.15-0.70]). In patients with NIHSS [&le;]10 (n=102), disconnected fiber volume remained the strongest predictor (AUC=0.83). ConclusionsDisconnected fiber volume derived indirectly is a robust prognostic marker of BAO outcomes that outperforms conventional predictors and may support future treatment decisions. Registrationhttps://clinicaltrials.gov - NCT03776877.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.9%
2
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
3
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 28%
4.3%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 37%
4.0%
7
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
8
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.1%
9
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
10
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
11
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
12
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
13
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
14
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
17
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
18
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.2%
19
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
22
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
23
Experimental Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%