Back

Exploring the association of subnational drowning mortality and environmental exposures: A global analysis using satellite-derived data

Essex, R.; Lim, S.; Jagnoor, J.

2026-04-21 public and global health
10.64898/2026.04.19.26351234 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionDrowning risk begins with water exposure, yet population-water relationships have rarely been quantified at scale using environmental measures. This study explored whether satellite-derived data was associated with subnational drowning mortality and whether associations differed by country income level. MethodsWe linked Global Burden of Disease (GBD 2021) age-standardised drowning mortality rates to satellite-derived exposures for 212 subnational regions across 12 countries (2006-2021; 3,392 region-years). Exposures were extracted via Google Earth Engine and standardised. Gamma-log generalised linear mixed models included region random intercepts and year fixed effects. Income-stratified models were estimated separately. Supplementary models assessed maritime vessel activity. ResultsNear-water population percentage was the strongest correlate of drowning (IRR 1.40; 95% CI 1.33-1.47). Permanent water coverage was protective (IRR 0.80; 0.73-0.88), as were nighttime lights (IRR 0.96; 0.95-0.97) and hot days [≥]30{degrees}C (IRR 0.95; 0.92-0.99). Mean temperature (IRR 1.17; 1.11-1.23) and precipitation (IRR 1.03; 1.01-1.04) were positively associated. Near-water effects were consistent across income strata (LIC 1.25; MIC 1.31; HIC 1.24), while other predictors showed weak or inconsistent within-strata associations. Vessel activity was modestly associated with drowning in Global Fishing Watch models (IRR 1.05; 1.01-1.09) but not in Synthetic Aperture Radar models. DiscussionSatellite-derived indicators can characterise drowning risk at scale, with population proximity to water emerging as a robust cross-context correlate. Protective associations for permanent water suggest landscape configuration may shape risk beyond proximity alone, highlighting geospatial datas value for targeting prevention where surveillance is limited.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.