Adaptive Frequency-Spatial Dual-Stream Network (AFS-DSN) for Nasal and Paranasal Sinus CT Segmentation
Wan, S.-Y.; Chen, W.-Y.
Show abstract
Accurate segmentation of nasal and paranasal sinus structures from CT scans is critical for surgical planning and treatment evaluation in rhinology. However, the complex anatomical topology and thin-wall boundaries of these structures pose significant challenges for automated segmentation methods. We propose AFS-DSN (Adaptive Frequency-Spatial Dual-Stream Network), a novel deep learning architecture that integrates multi-scale wavelet decomposition with spatial feature learning for binary segmentation of the nasal cavity complex. Our method employs a dual-stream encoder with frequency branch utilizing three wavelet scales (db1, db2, db4) to capture 24 frequency sub-bands, enabling enhanced boundary detection in anatomically challenging regions. Cross-domain attention and adaptive routing mechanisms dynamically fuse spatial and frequency features based on local tissue characteristics. We formulate the task as binary segmentation where all five anatomical structures (maxillary sinus, sphenoid sinus, ethmoid sinus, frontal sinus, and nasal cavity) are treated as a unified foreground region against the background, prioritizing clinical boundary detection over individual structure differentiation. Evaluated on the NasalSeg dataset (130 CT volumes) with a 70/15/15 train/validation/test split, AFS-DSN achieves 94.34% {+/-} 2.30% overall Dice coefficient with statistically significant improvements in thin-wall regions (91.34% vs. 90.57% baseline, p=0.004) and statistically significant improvement in Surface Dice at 1mm tolerance (0.874 vs. 0.868 baseline, p=0.010), demonstrating enhanced boundary precision while maintaining sub-second inference time, making the method suitable for surgical planning applications where sub-millimeter accuracy is clinically relevant. To address concerns regarding model complexity, we further introduce AFS-DSN-Lite, a parameter-efficient variant (27.41M parameters) that achieves comparable performance (94.37% Dice) through depthwise separable convolutions, and validate robustness via 3-fold cross-validation (mean Dice: 94.59% {+/-} 0.31%).
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Necessity and Impact of Specialization of Large Foundation Model for Medical Segmentation Tasks 95%
- Phase Recognition in Contrast-Enhanced CT Scans based on Deep Learning and Random Sampling 95%
- Selective ensemble methods for deep learning segmentation of major vessels in invasive coronary angiography 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- STAMP: Simultaneous Training and Model Pruning for Low Data Regimes in Medical Image Segmentation 95%
- Comparison of domain adaptation techniques for white matter hyperintensity segmentation in brain MR images 93%
- Automated 3D reconstruction of the fetal thorax in the standard atlas space from motion-corrupted MRI stacks for 21-36 weeks GA range 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.