Back

Evaluating MaxEnt Modeling Strategies for Predicting Suitable Habitats of Invasive Insects Under Climate Change Scenarios

CHOUHAN, P.; Zavala-Romero, O.; Haseeb, M.

2026-04-21 ecology
10.64898/2026.04.18.719331 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Invasive insect species pose serious threats to agriculture and ecosystems, with their spread increasingly accelerated by global trade and climate change. To support prevention and mitigation efforts, it is essential to map the regions where these pests can survive and thrive. Here, we apply MaxEnt, a leading species distribution modeling framework, to estimate current (2020) and future (2040-2060) suitable habitats for five major invasive insects across the contiguous United States: brown marmorated stink bug, corn earworm, spongy moth, root weevil, and spotted lanternfly. To account for an uncertain climatic future, these projections are generated under four shared socioeconomic pathways, which reflect a range of plausible climate change scenarios. Beyond forecasting distributions, we examine several key modeling decisions, especially those often overlooked in practice. In particular, we find that background sampling strategies play a critical role in model calibration and that a hybrid sampling approach with a moderate buffer bias provides better predictive accuracy. We also show that permutation importance scores, commonly used to rank environmental variables, are highly sensitive to small changes in the background data and should be interpreted with caution. Finally, to bridge the gap between ecological modeling and applied machine learning, we provide a self-contained, math-focused background to MaxEnt aimed at practitioners outside of traditional ecological fields. Overall, this work delivers reproducible modeling workflows and critical insights into building robust, transparent, and ecologically meaningful MaxEnt models for climate-informed species distribution analysis.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.2%
2
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.2%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.8%
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 16%
4.3%
7
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
9
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
10
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
11
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
12
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
14
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
15
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.5%
17
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
18
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
19
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
20
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
21
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
22
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
23
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
24
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
25
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
26
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
27
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
28
Parasites & Vectors
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Pest Management Science
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%