Back

Neurobehavioral Profiles of Inhibitory-Control Stratify Vulnerability and Resilience under Childhood Poverty

Hu, B.; Yang, T.; Hu, Y.; Liu, M.; Tan, S.; Li, X.; Qin, S.

2026-04-27 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.04.18.26350994 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveChildhood poverty is a high-risk context that involves diverse adversities, making it difficult to understand how poverty confers later psychopathology risk and why some children remain resilient despite growing up in poverty. To address this heterogeneity, we quantified adversity-linked vulnerability as adversity-psychopathology coupling and tested whether childhood poverty amplifies this coupling and whether multilevel inhibitory-control profiles stratify vulnerability and resilience within poverty-exposed youth. MethodsWe analyzed 10,112 youth (48.4% female; mean age = 9.92 years) from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study, linking baseline cumulative early-life adversity (ELA) to later behavioral problems across 4 waves. In the stop-signal task fMRI subsample of 7,401 youth, semi-supervised clustering of inhibitory-control activation identified neurofunctional subtypes within poverty-exposed youth. We also tested temperamental inhibitory control as an additional moderator. ResultsChildhood poverty amplified the association between cumulative ELA and behavioral problems at baseline ({Delta}{beta} = 0.088; P < .001) and across follow-up waves. Two neurofunctional subtypes were identified within poverty-exposed youth: subtype-1 showed greater vulnerability than higher-income peers ({Delta}{beta} = 0.149; P < .001), whereas subtype-2 showed attenuated vulnerability and did not differ from higher-income peers ({Delta}{beta} = 0.049; P = .135); this pattern persisted longitudinally. Among poverty-exposed youth in subtype-2 with high temperamental inhibitory control, the association between cumulative ELA and later behavioral problems was no longer significant. ConclusionsChildhood poverty strengthened the translation of adversity burden into later behavioral problems, but inhibitory-control profiles differentiated higher- and lower-risk pathways within poverty, highlighting inhibitory control as a candidate target for prevention.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
35.8%
2
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
96 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
16.8%
50% of probability mass above
3
Molecular Psychiatry
282 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.7%
4
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
5
JCPP Advances
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
6
Psychological Medicine
88 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.2%
7
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
60 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
8
Biological Psychiatry
137 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
9
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
71 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
10
Journal of Affective Disorders
92 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
11
Translational Psychiatry
260 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
Neurobiology of Stress
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
13
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
14
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
15
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
16
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.1%
17
Social Science & Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
18
The British Journal of Psychiatry
23 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
19
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
20
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
21
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
22
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.6%