Back

Comparative analysis of transposable elements in jellyfish and hydroid species (Cnidaria: Medusozoa)

Mays, A.; Cabrera, F.; Macias-Munoz, A.

2026-04-21 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.04.17.719288 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundTransposable elements (TEs) are repetitive genetic elements that can jump to new loci causing genome expansions, structural rearrangements, and can, ultimately, propel the evolution of genomes. Despite their significance, the role of TEs in the evolution of genomes and phylogenetic groups remains largely understudied in early diverging lineages. Further, the extent to which TE content varies across species is still an open question. Medusozoa, a group within Cnidaria encompassing jellyfish and hydroids, exhibits an exceptional diversity of life history strategies, body plans, and physiological capabilities. These characteristics, along with its early-diverging phylogenetic position, establish Medusozoa as an ideal system for investigating the composition and evolutionary history of TEs within the group. ResultsWe generated a custom repeat library built from annotations of 25 Medusozoan genomes and used it to characterize TEs, aiming to identify lineage-specific TE content and activity that may correlate with the diversity observed within the group. We found that repetitive element percentage and genome size varied considerably, with Hydrozoa exhibiting the most variation among classes in both respects. DNA transposons were the most prevalent TE classification in all but two genomes, averaging 28% of all genomes. Intra-genus comparisons revealed a surprising degree of differences in TE content. In the genus Aurelia, the expansion of a single DNA transposon superfamily accounted for much of the difference in repetitive element percentage between two species, whereas in the genus Turritopsis, a similar divergence resulted from the proliferation of multiple superfamilies. Interestingly, most genomes showed evidence of recent TE expansions, suggesting ongoing activity in many medusozoan species. ConclusionWe present the first comparative analysis of TEs across all medusozoan classes. Our results reveal class-specific TE dynamics and highlight cases of TE proliferations as lineages diverge. This research provides data on TE activity and diversity that can be used as a resource for future study and fills important gaps in our understanding of TEs in early diverging animal lineages.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.0%
2
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.5%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.0%
4
Mobile DNA
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
5
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
8
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
9
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.1%
10
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
12
Gigabyte
60 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
13
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
14
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
15
Journal of Molecular Evolution
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
16
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
17
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
19
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
20
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
21
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
22
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
23
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
24
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
25
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Journal of Heredity
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
29
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
30
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
61 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%