Emotion regulation or dual task? Dissociation of neural and behavioral measures

Cognitive reappraisal, the deliberate reinterpretation of emotional events, is widely considered an effective emotion regulation strategy, and modulation of the late positive potential (LPP) during negative affect reduction has become the primary electrophysiological evidence for volitional emotional control. Experimental instructions, however, impose dual-task demands that free viewing does not, confounding reappraisal with cognitive load. By including instructions to increase emotional responses to pictures ("enhance") as well as instructions to decrease ("suppress"), different predictions are generated. If the LPP reflects regulation, then, compared to free viewing, suppress instructions should decrease LPP amplitude, and enhance instructions should increase LPP amplitude. If modulation instead reflects cognitive load, both instructions should reduce the LPP, as both impose an additional cognitive task. In a sample of 107 participants, evaluative ratings confirmed that regulation instructions modulated reported emotional intensity in the expected directions (Enhance > View > Suppress), but that both enhance and suppress instructions reduced LPP amplitude compared to free viewing, with Bayesian model comparisons providing strong evidence against direction-specific regulation and in favor of cognitive load. Whole-scalp multivariate pattern analysis confirmed that no instruction-related neural signal exists at any scalp location or latency within the first second after stimulus onset. These data indicate that LPP modulation following both instruction types reflects dual-task cognitive load rather than volitional emotional control. Significance StatementCognitive reappraisal is considered the gold standard of emotion regulation, and reduced late positive potential (LPP) amplitude during negative emotion suppression is the primary neural evidence that humans can voluntarily control emotional responses. The current data are inconsistent with this regulatory account and instead support a cognitive load interpretation. Whether instructed to enhance or suppress emotional responses, LPP amplitude was reduced in both conditions relative to free viewing, consistent with attentional resource competition rather than directional regulatory control. The same participants reported successfully regulating emotional experience in opposite directions, producing a clear dissociation between neural and behavioral measures. These findings challenge a basic tenet of emotional regulation and raise questions concerning LPP modulation as a biomarker of regulatory capacity.