Back

CGAgentX: Agentic AI Framework to Develop Transferable Coarse-Grained Models

Deshmukh, S. A.; Seth, S.

2026-04-18 biophysics
10.64898/2026.04.17.719081 bioRxiv
Show abstract

We present CGAgentX, a general autonomous multi-agent framework in which specialized LLM-based agents coordinate the optimization of coarse-grained (CG) model parameters to reproduce target properties. Using polar solvents -- dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMA) -- as representative case studies, we demonstrate the frameworks capability to develop CG models that accurately reproduce key properties from atomistic simulations and experimental literature. Six specialized agents -- Mapping, Topology, Boundary, Hypothesis, Diagnostic, and Optimization -- operate under a Master Agent that orchestrates closed-loop, iterative parameter refinement by autonomously invoking external tools, including molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and analysis workflows, and evaluating outputs through a fitness function. Central to the framework is a Hypothesis Agent that generates and verifies physically motivated parameter hypotheses by coordinating parallel multi-fork simulations, wherein multiple candidate parameter sets are evaluated simultaneously. This multi-fork strategy expands parameter space exploration, yielding richer datasets that enable more accurate hypothesis refinement across iterations. Agents adaptively propose parameter updates based on intermediate simulation outcomes, enabling efficient navigation of complex trade-offs among structural, thermodynamic, and transport properties. The framework reproduces key experimental properties within 5% accuracy while maintaining consistency with atomistic reference behavior, achieving convergence without manual intervention. The modular architecture is readily extensible to other molecular systems and can accommodate additional targets, constraints, or simulation engines, providing a general agentic-AI platform for transferable CG model development. TOC GRAPHICS O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=110 SRC="FIGDIR/small/719081v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (48K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1caa787org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1bcb5eaorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@4b21d2org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@999675_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
51.2%
50% of probability mass above
2
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
126 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.5%
4
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
5
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
6
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.3%
7
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
8
IUCrJ
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
9
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
10
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
11
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.3%
12
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.1%
13
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
14
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.9%
16
Journal of Computational Chemistry
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.9%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
19
The Journal of Chemical Physics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
20
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.7%