Back

Structure-informed Siamese graph neural networks classify CirA missense variants with implications for cefiderocol susceptibility

Razavi, M.; Tellapragada, C.; Giske, C. G.

2026-04-21 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.04.17.718272 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cefiderocol uptake in Enterobacterales depends partly on TonB-dependent catecholate transporters, including CirA, yet the functional interpretation of CirA missense variation remains limited by an absence of large experimental phenotype datasets. Here we describe a structure-informed Siamese graph neural network (GNN) framework designed to prioritise CirA missense variants that are likely to impair transporter function and thereby contribute to reduced cefiderocol susceptibility. Because large experimental datasets of CirA missense phenotypes are not available, we trained the model on a synthetic mutant set generated from structurally motivated rules applied to the CirA reference structure (AlphaFold model, UniProt P17315). Each residue was represented using protein language model embeddings, backbone geometry, and amino-acid identity, and paired wild-type and mutant graphs were compared through a shared encoder. On synthetic held-out benchmarks, the model achieved strong classification performance on a position-held-out split (macro-F1 = 0.989 against synthetic labels). Applied to a collection of Escherichia coli CirA protein sequences, the framework prioritised a subset of variants as high-confidence non-benign candidates and assigned many others to review or abstain categories, reflecting predictive uncertainty outside the synthetic training distribution. A post-hoc severity-ranking scheme triages disruptive candidates for follow-up. This framework demonstrates that structure-informed synthetic data generation paired with Siamese GNN inference can bridge the gap between sequence-level genomic surveillance and mechanistic functional prediction of outer-membrane transporter variants.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 6%
18.3%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.1%
3
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 3%
9.9%
4
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.2%
5
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
7
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 25%
2.7%
9
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.3%
10
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
11
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
12
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
13
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.7%
14
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
15
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.2%
18
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
19
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.9%
20
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
21
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 76%
0.7%
23
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
24
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
25
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 38%
0.6%