Multi-omic signatures of genetic mechanisms inform on type 2 diabetes biology and patient heterogeneity
Sevilla-Gonzalez, M.; Martinez-Munoz, A. M.; Hanson, P. A.; Hsu, S.; Wang, X.; Smith, K.; Chen, Z.-Z.; Szczerbinski, L.; Kaur, V.; Taylor, K. D.; Wood, A. C.; Mi, M. Y.; Li, H.; Wittenbecher, C.; Gerszten, R. E.; Rich, S.; Rotter, J.; Li, J.; Mercader, J. M.; Manning, A. K.; Shah, R. V. K.; Udler, M.
Show abstract
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a heterogeneous disease shaped by genetic pathways related to insulin resistance and {beta}-cell dysfunction, but how this heterogeneity is reflected molecularly remains unclear. We integrated partitioned polygenic scores (pPS) with proteomic and metabolomic profiling to define molecular signatures of T2D and their clinical relevance. We analyzed UK Biobank participants with genomic, proteomic, and metabolomic data. In a disease-free training subset, we used LASSO regression to identify multi-omic signatures associated with each pPS by jointly modeling proteins and metabolites. In an independent testing set, we constructed multi-omic scores and examined their associations with clinical traits and diabetes-related outcomes. Mediation analyses were used to investigate putative causal pathways. Key findings were evaluated in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). We identified distinct multi-omic signatures that capture the molecular architecture of T2D genetic risk across physiological subtypes. Compared with genetic scores alone, multi-omic pPS showed larger effect sizes and better disease discrimination. These scores recapitulated subtype-specific physiology and were associated with T2D risk. The Beta-Cell 2 multi-omic score showed marked stratification for insulin use, which was replicated in MESA, where it also predicted future insulin use. Mediation analyses implicated lipoprotein remodeling and fatty acid metabolism in the Lipodystrophy 1 cluster, accounting for 30-45% of the total effect of pPS on T2D risk. Integrating process-specific genetic risk with circulating multi-omic profiles reveals biologically distinct endotypes of T2D and supports a framework for improved patient stratification and risk assessment.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of plasma proteomic markers underlying polygenic risk of type 2 diabetes and related comorbidities 96%
- Comprehensive genetic analysis of the human lipidome identifies novel loci controlling lipid homeostasis with links to coronary artery disease 95%
- Metabolome-wide Mendelian randomization characterizes heterogeneous and shared causal effects of metabolites on human health 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrative proteogenomic analyses provide novel interpretations of type 1 diabetes risk loci through circulating proteins 97%
- Characterizing common and rare variations in non-traditional glycemic biomarkers using multivariate approaches on multi-ancestry ARIC study 96%
- β-cell SENP1 facilitates responsiveness to incretins and limits oral glucose intolerance in high fat fed mice 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Unravelling the molecular mechanisms causal to type 2 diabetes across global populations and disease-relevant tissues 95%
- Identification and characterization of human GDF15 knockouts 95%
- Characterization of the genetic architecture of BMI in infancy and early childhood reveals age-specific effects and implicates pathways involved in Mendelian obesity 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The extracellular vesicle transcriptome provides tissue-specific functional genomic annotation relevant to disease susceptibility in obesity 95%
- Analysis across Taiwan Biobank, Biobank Japan and UK Biobank identifies hundreds of novel loci for 36 quantitative traits 93%
- Identification of novel type 1 and type 2 diabetes genes by co-localization of human islet eQTL and GWAS variants with colocRedRibbon 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.