Back

Multi-omic signatures of genetic mechanisms inform on type 2 diabetes biology and patient heterogeneity

Sevilla-Gonzalez, M.; Martinez-Munoz, A. M.; Hanson, P. A.; Hsu, S.; Wang, X.; Smith, K.; Chen, Z.-Z.; Szczerbinski, L.; Kaur, V.; Taylor, K. D.; Wood, A. C.; Mi, M. Y.; Li, H.; Wittenbecher, C.; Gerszten, R. E.; Rich, S.; Rotter, J.; Li, J.; Mercader, J. M.; Manning, A. K.; Shah, R. V. K.; Udler, M.

2026-04-25 endocrinology
10.64898/2026.04.17.26351136 medRxiv
Show abstract

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a heterogeneous disease shaped by genetic pathways related to insulin resistance and beta cell dysfunction, but how this heterogeneity is reflected molecularly remains unclear. We integrated partitioned polygenic scores (pPS) with proteomic and metabolomic profiling to define molecular signatures of T2D and their clinical relevance. We analyzed UK Biobank participants with genomic, proteomic, and metabolomic data. In a disease-free training subset, we used LASSO regression to identify multi-omic signatures associated with each pPS by jointly modeling proteins and metabolites. In an independent testing set, we constructed multi-omic scores and examined their associations with clinical traits and diabetes-related outcomes. Mediation analyses were used to investigate putative causal pathways. Key findings were evaluated in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). We identified distinct multi-omic signatures that capture the molecular architecture of T2D genetic risk across physiological subtypes. Compared with genetic scores alone, multi-omic pPS showed larger effect sizes and better disease discrimination. These scores recapitulated subtype-specific physiology and were associated with T2D risk. The Beta-Cell 2 multi-omic score showed marked stratification for insulin use, which was replicated in MESA, where it also predicted future insulin use. Mediation analyses implicated lipoprotein remodeling and fatty acid metabolism in the Lipodystrophy 1 cluster, accounting for up to 45% of the total effect of pPS on T2D risk. Integrating process-specific genetic risk with circulating multi-omic profiles reveals biologically distinct endotypes of T2D and supports a framework for improved patient stratification and risk assessment.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 6%
18.4%
2
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
3
Cell Metabolism
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.7%
4
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.3%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.3%
6
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.3%
8
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.3%
9
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
10
Diabetologia
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.9%
11
Diabetes
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
12
Nature Metabolism
56 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.0%
13
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
15
Molecular Metabolism
105 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
16
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
17
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
19
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.9%
20
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.9%
21
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.8%
22
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.7%