Back

Menopause in the All of Us Research Program: A Descriptive Summary of Electronic Health Record and Survey Response across Sociodemographic Characteristics

Staples, J. W.; White, S. L.; Giacalone, A.; Pozdeyev, N.; Sammel, M. D.; Stranger, B. E.; Valencia, C. I.; Santoro, N.; Hendricks, A. E.

2026-04-25 sexual and reproductive health
10.64898/2026.04.17.26351129 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveMenopause is a significant physiological transition with implications for health outcomes (e.g., cardiometabolic), yet gaps remain in understanding the menopause transition, including how menopause timing and type influence health outcomes. Large-scale cohort studies in midlife (age[~]40-60) females, including the All of Us Research Program (AoURP), provide opportunities to study menopause across diverse populations and data modalities. We characterized menopause-related data in AoURP, focusing on age distributions and concordance between EHR diagnosis codes and self-reported survey responses. MethodsWe analyzed menopause-related survey, EHR diagnostic code, and genomic data among [~]396,000 participants in AoURP with female sex. We summarized menopause data across modalities, overlap between survey, EHR, and genomic data, and age distributions overall and across sociodemographic characteristics. ResultsAmong [~]396,000 females, surveys captured [~]193,000 menopause observations, nearly seven times more than structured EHR diagnoses ([~]28,000), suggesting under-ascertainement in EHR data. Nearly all females ([~]99%) with an EHR menopause diagnosis also reported menopause in the survey. Approximately 22,000 participants had intersected EHR, survey, and genomic menopause-related data. Survey-based age patterns matched expectations, with participants <40 years predominantly reporting pre-menopausal status and those >60 years predominantly reporting post-menopausal status. A small subset (N{approx}1,700; 4%) (age>70 years) reported no menopause, suggesting response or recall bias. EHR menopause codes were concentrated after age>45 years, with a notable spike at age 65. Modest differences in survey-based menopause age distributions were observed by sociodemographic characteristics (e.g., race, ancestry). ConclusionsThese findings inform sampling strategies, power calculations, phenotype definition, and study design for menopause research using AoURP.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.7%
2
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.2%
4
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.5%
5
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.4%
7
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.8%
10
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
11
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.9%
13
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.2%
15
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
16
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
17
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
18
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
20
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
21
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
22
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
23
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.7%
24
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
25
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.5%
26
The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
27
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
28
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
29
Human Reproduction
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
30
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%