Back

Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Failed Epilepsy Surgery: 36 Month Outcomes From the CORE-VNS Study

Nicolai, E. N.; Sieradzan, K.; Schijns, O.; Fry, M. P.; Rijkers, K.; Verner, R.; Baeesa, S. S.; Kurwale, N.; Giannicola, G.; Gordon, C.; Moon, A.; Beraldi, F.; Sen, A.; Mays, D. A.

2026-04-22 neurology
10.64898/2026.04.17.26351099 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveVagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an established neuromodulation therapy used in the management of drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), or when other intracranial surgical modalities have not reduced seizure burden. We evaluated whether prior intracranial surgery for epilepsy influences safety and effectiveness outcomes with adjunctive VNS, using real-world data from the CORE-VNS study. MethodsCORE-VNS (NCT03529045), a prospective, multicenter, international observational study, was designed to collect data on seizure and non-seizure outcomes in patients with DRE treated with VNS. Participants were identified as having or not having undergone prior intracranial brain surgery for epilepsy (ICSE) and received an initial VNS implant. Baseline seizure frequency data and patient-reported outcome measures were collected at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. This analysis compared the baseline data for VNS therapy and safety outcomes at 36 months. ResultsAmong 531 participants implanted with VNS, prior ICSE was performed in 84. Median percentage seizure reductions at 36 months for all seizures (76.6% and 76.3%), all focal seizures (83.3% and 71.8%), and all generalized seizures (77.8% and 76.2%) were found to be similar between those without and with a history of ICSE, respectively. The 50% responder rate for all seizures reported at baseline was similar, 64.8% and 61.8%, in both groups and complete seizure freedom was reported by 17.9% and 8.8%, respectively. Implant-related adverse events (AE) and serious AE rates were similar between groups. ConclusionVNS was associated with clinically meaningful seizure reductions and showed a consistent safety profile irrespective of the history of ICSE. Prior ICSE should not be a contraindication to the consideration of VNS.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Epilepsia
56 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.3%
2
Epilepsia Open
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.2%
3
Epilepsy Research
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
4
Clinical Neurophysiology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
Epilepsy & Behavior
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
6
Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.6%
7
Annals of Neurology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.4%
8
European Journal of Neurology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
9
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.3%
10
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
11
Neurosurgery
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
12
Brain Stimulation
125 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
13
Brain
168 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
14
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.4%
15
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
16
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
17
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
18
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
30 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
19
Neurotherapeutics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
20
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
21
Disease Models & Mechanisms
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%