Back

Host background shapes the portability of a non-canonical translation initiation system across Escherichia coli strains

Scopelliti, D.; Hutvagner, A.; Jaschke, P. R.

2026-04-17 synthetic biology
10.64898/2026.04.16.719103 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Translation initiation has become an attractive target for engineering orthogonal translation systems, yet the extent to which these systems retain functionality across distinct host backgrounds remains poorly defined. In bacteria, start codon recognition depends on pairing between the initiator tRNA anticodon and a suitable start codon within the appropriate distance from the Shine-Dalgarno sequence. These sequence-specific interactions enable translation initiation to be reprogrammed through anticodon engineering. What is currently missing is an understanding of how anticodon mutants of initiator tRNAs function across different bacterial strains. Here, we systematically evaluated the portability of a library of twelve i-tRNA anticodon mutants paired with their complementary non-canonical start codons. Most i-tRNA-start codon pairs supported detectable translation initiation across multiple strains, demonstrating broad functional portability. However, initiation efficiency, absolute system output, and fitness effects varied substantially between strains. Comparative genomic analyses revealed host-specific gene differences broadly, and endogenous tRNA gene sequence and copy number specifically, was associated with this variability. While most i-tRNA variants were well tolerated, a subset produced strain-dependent growth defects that primarily affected growth rate rather than final culture density. Together, these findings show that translation initiation efficacy of engineered i-tRNAs is partially strain-dependent and that host background must be considered a key design variable when deploying these translation systems. Looking forward, this study provides a framework for host-aware selection of microbial chassis for orthogonal translation applications in synthetic biology. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=100 SRC="FIGDIR/small/719103v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (20K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@118b02borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1d5dab0org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1088d0borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@63eb74_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.5%
2
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 1%
12.4%
3
ACS Chemical Biology
150 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
4
ACS Central Science
66 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
5
RSC Chemical Biology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
6
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
7
Metabolic Engineering
68 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
8
Cell Chemical Biology
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.9%
10
Microbial Biotechnology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
11
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
12
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
14
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
15
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
16
Nature Chemical Biology
104 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
17
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.1%
18
Biochemistry
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
19
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
20
Synthetic Biology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
21
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 53%
0.9%
22
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
25
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
27
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.7%
28
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
29
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.5%
30
ChemBioChem
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%