Back

Self-Interaction Nanoparticle Spectroscopy Predicts High-Concentration Viscosity of Therapeutic IgG1 Antibodies

Paidi, S. K.; Ibrahim, J.; Stepurska, K.; Zarzar, J.; Izadi, S.; Rude, E.; Luu, S.; Kovner, D.; O'Connor, K.; Bol, K.; Mehta, S.; Andersen, N.; Stephens, N.; Makowski, E.; Heisler, J.; Swartz, T.; Carter, P. J.; Baginski, T.

2026-04-21 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.04.16.719068 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Predicting high-concentration viscosity of monoclonal antibodies such as IgG1 is crucial for their development as therapeutics for subcutaneous delivery. Unfortunately, traditional experimental rheometry methods for assessing viscosity are low-throughput. This study evaluates Self-Interaction Nanoparticle Spectroscopy (SINS) assays--specifically charge-stabilized SINS (CS-SINS) and PEG-stabilized SINS (PS-SINS)--for high-throughput viscosity prediction. We characterized 96 IgG1 antibodies, assessing SINS against in silico descriptors and dynamic light scattering (DLS) data. CS-SINS showed strong correlation with charge, offering limited additional utility. In contrast, PS-SINS provided orthogonal information; integrating it with in silico data and DLS significantly improved random forest model accuracy for binary viscosity classification. PS-SINS measurements in multiple buffers captured complementary information, achieving comparable accuracy without DLS. Importantly, PS-SINS scores exhibited a strong logarithmic relationship (r=0.98) with high-concentration viscosity in Fc variants of clinical antibodies, suggesting a direct mechanistic link. Furthermore, PS-SINS performed reliably with one column purified (protein A) samples, supporting its early-stage application. These findings establish PS-SINS as a high-throughput tool to accelerate the developability assessment of antibody candidates.

Matching journals

The top 14 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.3%
2
Langmuir
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
3
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.9%
4
JACS Au
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
5
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
68 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
6
Communications Chemistry
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
8
ACS Sensors
45 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.3%
9
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.1%
10
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 33%
2.5%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.5%
13
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
65 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.4%
14
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
15
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
16
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
17
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
mAbs
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
19
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
20
ACS Central Science
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
21
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.3%
22
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
23
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
24
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.0%
25
The Analyst
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
26
Small Methods
26 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
27
Photoacoustics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
28
Cell Reports Physical Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
29
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
30
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%