The effect of long-term management on wild pig (Sus scrofa x domesticus) populations across the southeastern United States

O_LIThe management of invasive species often emphasizes removals to manage populations. However, evaluating the success of this management technique remains challenging, especially at large scales. Understanding the relationship between removal intensity and population growth is essential for determining when management achieves desired outcomes. C_LIO_LIWe used management removal data (removal resources [e.g. trapping] and relative effort [trap nights]) to estimate population density, demographic structure, and growth rates of invasive wild pigs (Sus scrofax domesticus) across a large landscape. From the management data and population estimates, we inferred population trajectories in the absence of removals and quantified the proportion of the population removed by the most widely used methods to control wild pigs. We then compared observed removal intensities and population growth rates to predict expected population trajectories immediately after management occurs. C_LIO_LIResults suggest substantial spatial and temporal variation in wild pig growth rates and variation in the effectiveness of removal efforts. Additionally, removing wild pigs at higher densities had a greater effect on limiting population growth than removals conducted at lower densities, though both are important. However, on large properties, removal intensity was often insufficient to offset population growth, indicating that management effort does not scale to large areas. C_LIO_LIThese results demonstrate how removal data and population modeling can provide robust inference on population dynamics and management effectiveness, offering a scalable framework for evaluating and improving invasive species control programs. We also discuss the current limitation of how effort is defined for different large-mammal removal techniques, and offer potential solutions for a more complete definition, such as going beyond trap nights and including constraints on personnel, equipment, and logistics. C_LI