Back

A confirmatory, dual-centric non-human primate study on the efficacy of novel oropharyngeal spray immunization with an adenoviral vector vaccine against RSV -- Important lessons learned

Tenbusch, M.; Koopman, G.; Mooij, P.; Roshani, B.; Irrgang, P.; Lapuente, D.; Kondova, I.; Bogers, W. M.; Remarque, E. J.; Vestweber, R.; Merida Ruiz, S. A.; Krüger, N.; Meyer, S.; Gefeller, O.; Stahl-Hennig, C.; Überla, K.

2026-04-20 immunology
10.64898/2026.04.16.718916 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In a confirmatory study, we evaluated the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of a heterologous prime-boost vaccination strategy against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in non-human primates. Building on prior evidence of protective mucosal immunity induced by intramuscular DNA priming followed by an oropharyngeal adenoviral boost, we conducted a randomized, blinded, dual-centre study across two European primate research facilities. Rhesus macaques received a codon-optimized RSV-F DNA vaccine via electroporation, followed by two mucosal administrations of a recombinant adenovirus serotype 5 vector encoding the same antigen. Control groups included animals vaccinated with irrelevant influenza antigens and a comparator group mimicking natural immunity induced by primary RSV infection. Systemic and mucosal immune responses, including RSV-F-specific antibodies and tissue-resident memory T cells, were monitored longitudinally. Here, we detected robust immune responses, but with some variability between the two centres. However, following experimental RSV challenge performed 22 weeks after the final immunization, RSV-vaccinated animals demonstrated markedly reduced viral replication in both upper and lower respiratory tracts. However, unexpected RSV-specific immunity in the control group at one single study site prevented confirmation of the predefined primary endpoint. Overall, these results support the potential of mucosal adenoviral boosting following DNA priming to induce protective immunity against RSV, while highlighting challenges associated with multi-centre preclinical vaccine studies.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.1%
2
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.4%
3
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
4
npj Vaccines
62 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
Molecular Therapy
71 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.9%
6
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.4%
7
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.4%
8
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.2%
9
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 13%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
10
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.6%
11
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.3%
12
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.8%
14
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
15
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 41%
1.7%
16
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
17
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
19
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
20
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.7%
21
Mucosal Immunology
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
22
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.3%
23
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
24
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
25
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.0%
26
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
27
Science Immunology
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Immunology & Cell Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
29
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
30
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
38 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%