Integrating glycosylation in de novo protein design with ReGlyco Binder Design Filter
Singh, O.; Fadda, E.
Show abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based methods for 3D protein structure prediction are revolutionising structural biology1-7, providing novel templates for experimental data refinement and an on demand 3D perspective on any molecular architecture and protein-protein interaction (PPI). Regardless of the inherent limitations of the various approaches available to date, the continuous improvement of the algorithms, the broad availability of open access (OA) web servers3,8, software packages6,9 and databases10,11 are bound to accelerate the discovery and optimization of novel biopharmaceuticals12,13. Within this context, the development of computational pipelines for the de novo design of target-specific protein binders12,14,15 is especially exciting. As it stands, these processes are still rather inefficient16 and expensive, rapidly outputting thousands of designs relatively quickly, which translate into meagre yields. Here we show how the explicit integration of glycosylation as a filter in the 3D de novo design pipeline can significantly improve efficiency and reduce laboratory costs with minimal additional computational resources. As a proof-of-concept, we used the GlycoShape database and ReGlyco tools (https://glycoshape.org)17 to filter the results of a recent open competition launched by Adaptyv Bio for the design of binders as inhibitors against the heavily glycosylated Nipah virus glycoprotein (NiV-G) (https://proteinbase.com/competitions/adaptyv-nipah-competition). Screening of the 1,201 selected designs in block with ReGlyco, refined with the new ReGlyco Rotamer tool, flagged 11% of non-binders prior to experiment in approximately 3 hours on a dual-core CPU. We complement this analysis with a demo colab notebook (https://colab.research.google.com/github/Ojas-Singh/GlycoShape-Resources/blob/main/colab/ReGlyco_Binder_Design_filter.ipynb) to illustrate our workflow. In this demo users can design mini binders against human erythropoietin (hEPO) by integrating GlycoShape resources with the RFdiffusion3 (RFD3) pipeline18 from the Institute for Protein Design (IDP).
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- PRosettaC: Rosetta based modeling of PROTAC mediated ternary complexes 96%
- CENsible: Interpretable Insights into Small-Molecule Binding with Context Explanation Networks 95%
- PROTACable is an Integrative Computational Pipeline of 3-D Modeling and Deep Learning to Automate the De Novo Design of PROTACs 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- AbDesign: Database of point mutants of antibodies with associated structures reveals poor generalization of binding predictions from machine learning models. 94%
- AlphaBind, a Domain-Specific Model to Predict and Optimize Antibody-Antigen Binding Affinity 93%
- Tuning antibody stability and function by rational designs of framework mutations 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.