Back

Why the Sleeping Brain Clears

Kerskens, C.

2026-04-16 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.04.16.718904 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The mechanical origin of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and interstitial fluid (ISF) transport remains unresolved. High-frequency arterial pulsations ([~] 1 Hz) have long been proposed as a driver of CSF flow, yet multiple biomechanical analyses suggest that their ability to support deep bulk interstitial transport is severely limited by the poroelastic resistance of neural tissue. At the same time, slow-wave sleep is associated with large, synchronous CSF oscillations and enhanced clearance-related dynamics near [~] 0.05 Hz. What selects this low-frequency regime remains unclear. Here we propose a theoretical framework in which this frequency selection is not incidental, but mechanically necessary. When neural populations update their state, local thermodynamic demand induces microvascular dilation. Under intracranial volume constraints, this blood-volume expansion must, to leading order, be compensated by displacement of other intracranial volume components, including CSF. We model the poroelastic response of the interstitial matrix and obtain an effective low-pass filter for this displacement, with a nominal cut-off frequency in the slow-wave range (rc {approx} 0.05 Hz). This mechanical filter implies two distinct forcing regimes. During wakefulness, rapid commitment and sensorimotor resetting are hypothesized to generate spectrally sharp, high-frequency transients in vascular volume. Because this spectral content lies largely above the poroelastic passband, waking dynamics are predicted to be inefficient at driving deep bulk transport. Slow-wave sleep, by contrast, reduces rapid commitment-like transitions and permits smoother, more globally synchronized vascular-volume oscillations that fall within the passband and support larger-scale CSF motion. The framework yields several falsifiable predictions, including load-dependent modulation of sleep-associated CSF pulsation amplitudes, a BOLD-first / CSF-second temporal ordering during slow-wave events, and a mechanical discrepancy between deep interstitial transport and the rapid dispersion of superficial exogenous tracers. More generally, the theory advances a strong claim: the sleeping brain is mechanically privileged for large-scale CSF dynamics not because sleep introduces a new driver, but because sleep permits forcing in a frequency range that brain tissue can actually transmit.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
22.9%
2
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 1%
10.6%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.5%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 11%
6.9%
5
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.4%
7
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.0%
8
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.6%
10
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.8%
11
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
12
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 19%
2.5%
13
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
14
Physical Review Letters
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
15
Nature Physics
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
16
PRX Life
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
17
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.2%
18
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.1%
19
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
20
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
21
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 74%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.7%
25
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.5%
26
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.5%
27
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
28
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%