Back

Assessing the impact of artificial night lighting regulations designed to protect astronomical observatories on seabirds and bats

de Tena, C.; Rodriguez, B.; Garcia, D.; de la Paz, J. F.; Rodriguez, A.

2026-04-18 ecology
10.64898/2026.04.16.718868 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Artificial light at night is a rapidly increasing driver of global change, affecting both astronomical observations and biodiversity. Regulations such as the Canary Islands "Sky Law" were designed to protect astronomical observations by controlling light intensity and spectral composition, yet their ecological effectiveness remains largely untested. Here, we experimentally assessed whether lighting conditions permitted under this law influence the behaviour of two sensitive nocturnal taxa: seabirds and bats. Field experiments were conducted in Tenerife, Canary Islands, using controlled lighting treatments that varied in intensity (low vs. high) and spectrum (PC amber ~1800K vs. white ~2700K), including a no-light control. We monitored the behaviour of breeding adult Corys shearwaters (Calonectris borealis) using GPS tracking and passive acoustic recording, and quantified bat activity through ultrasonic detectors. Behavioural responses included flight characteristics, colony attendance, vocal activity in shearwaters, and species-specific movement and feeding activity in bats. Generalised linear mixed models were used to evaluate treatment effects while accounting for environmental covariates. Across 211 shearwater flights and extensive acoustic datasets, we found no consistent or significant effects of light treatments on seabird flight behaviour, vocal activity, or bat movement and feeding activity. Instead, environmental variables such as moonlight, seasonality, and interannual variation were stronger predictors of behavioural responses. These results suggest that lighting conditions currently permitted under the Sky Law may have limited ecological impact on the studied taxa under the conditions tested. Further research in less disturbed environments and with broader spectral contrasts is needed to better assess the ecological implications of astronomically motivated lighting regulations.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 13%
14.2%
2
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.3%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 19%
6.3%
4
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.3%
5
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
6
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.9%
7
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.9%
8
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
9
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
10
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
11
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.3%
12
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
13
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
14
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
15
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
16
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
17
Marine Ecology Progress Series
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
18
Limnology and Oceanography: Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
19
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
20
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
21
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 52%
0.9%
22
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
23
Journal of Thermal Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
24
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
26
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
27
Animal Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
28
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
30
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%