Back

Refining the Serine Protease Autotransporters of Enterobacteriaceae (SPATE) gene detection in Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli genomes uncovers differential SPATE distribution by phylogeny

Dada, R. A.; Afolayan, A. O.; Adewuyi, O. A.; Tytler, B. A.; Olayinka, B. O.; Thomson, N. R.; Okeke, I. N.

2026-04-16 microbiology
10.64898/2026.04.16.715897 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundEnteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAEC) are a heterogenous pathotype, implicated in acute and persistent diarrhoea especially in developing countries. Serine Protease Autotransporters of Enterobacteriaceae (SPATEs) are Type V Secretory System trypsin-like proteases repeatedly reported from EAEC. This study aimed to determine SPATE encoding-gene prevalence among EAEC and their association with diarrhoea. We screened 881 EAEC genomes from four recent epidemiological studies in Nigeria for 23 SPATE-encoding genes, initially using ARIBA and the Virulencefinder database. ResultsInitial screening inflated SPATE gene content, particularly in genomes with multiple SPATEs, due to cross detection of highly similar sequences and other artefacts. We developed and validated refined methodology, which detected 478 of 1,156 original SPATE calls and also identified SPATE miscalls from previous datasets in the literature. The most prevalent SPATE-encoding gene in our EAEC collection was sepA 297(33.71%), closely followed by sat 360 (29.74%). pic, encoding a SPATE with mucinase activity, was found in 65 (7.4%) genomes and associated with diarrhoea (p=0.00004). EAEC strains belonging to E. coli phylogroups A, B1 or C carried, on average, one SPATE gene per genome while >1 was typically detected in phylogroup B2 EAEC. Other EAEC carried few or no SPATE genes. ConclusionsOur study shows that multifunctional genome analysis tools may have to be refined for certain gene families to avoid overestimation. SPATEs are not as prevalent as previously thought but they remain common among EAEC, particularly among phylogroup A, B1, B2 and C, pointing to the possibility that they make lineage-specific contributions to disease.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.1%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
12.1%
3
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.7%
4
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.1%
5
Microbiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
6
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.5%
9
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
11
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
12
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
13
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
14
Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
15
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
BMC Microbiology
35 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.2%
17
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
20
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Pathogens
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
26
Journal of Medical Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
27
Access Microbiology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
28
Microbial Pathogenesis
13 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
29
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.6%
30
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%