Validation of methods for forecasting the frequency of non-vaccine serotypes after introduction or switch of a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine
Thindwa, D.; Weinberger, D. M.
Show abstract
BackgroundTo anticipate the impact of new pneumococcal vaccines and guide future updates, accurate forecasts of changes in non-vaccine serotypes (NVTs) are needed. We developed and evaluated three models that incorporated different assumptions about the way in which NVTs will increase and generated ensemble predictions for the frequency of NVTs in different post-pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV) periods. MethodsWe analyzed age- and serotype-specific invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) cases from the United States CDCs Active Bacterial Core surveillance during the pre-PCV (1998-1999), early post-PCV7 (2000-2004), late post-PCV7/pre-PCV13 (2005-2009), early post-PCV13 (2010-2014), and late post-PCV13 (2015-2019) periods. These data were augmented with IPD cases from several countries and combined with serotype-specific invasiveness to infer serotype-specific carriage prevalence. Three models ("Ranking", "Proportionate", "NFDS-lite") generated independent predictions of post-PCV IPD frequencies, which were integrated using an accuracy-weighted ensemble. Model performance was evaluated using the normalized root mean square error (NRMSE). ResultsA total of 23,959 non-PCV7 and 15,580 non-PCV13 cases were analyzed. NVT cases increased from the pre-PCV7 to the late post-PCV7 and post-PCV13 periods. The accuracy of predictions across age groups and models was consistent and high during the post-PCV13 periods but varied during the post-PCV7 periods. The Proportionate model (NRMSE=0.70-3.95) outperformed the NFDS-lite (NRMSE=0.93-8.91) and Ranking (NRMSE=1.51-5.37) models during the early-post-PCV7 period, whereas the NFDS-lite model (NRMSE=1.55-9.82) was superior to the Proportionate (NRMSE=1.45-10.22) and Ranking (NRMSE=1.86-11.35) models during the late post-PCV7 period. The Ensemble model improved on these individual models. ConclusionsThe Ensemble model offers a tool for forecasting serotype patterns to inform pneumococcal vaccines impact and future pneumococcal vaccine formulation.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Utilizing virus genomic surveillance to predict vaccine effectiveness 94%
- Estimating the contribution of HIV-infected adults to household pneumococcal transmission in South Africa, 2016-2018: A hidden Markov modelling study 94%
- Evaluating targeted COVID-19 vaccination strategies with agent-based modeling 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine learning-driven identification of serotype-independent pneumococcal vaccine candidates using samples from human infection challenge studies 95%
- Projecting the impact of a two-dose COVID-19 vaccination campaign in Ontario, Canada 93%
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of 21-valent pneumococcal conjugated vaccine among adults in Canada 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- SARS-CoV-2 mechanistic correlates of protection: insight from modelling response to vaccines 92%
- Changes in transmission of Enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) in England inferred from seroprevalence data 91%
- SARS-CoV-2 transmission dynamics in South Africa and epidemiological characteristics of the Omicron variant 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modelling the Interplay between Responsive Individual Vaccination Decisions and the Spread of SARS-CoV-2 93%
- Impact of vaccination and non-pharmaceutical interventions on SARS-CoV-2 dynamics in Switzerland 92%
- Reconstruction of SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks in a primary school using epidemiological and genomic data 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of vaccination on COVID-19 outbreaks in the United States 92%
- Burden of lower respiratory tract infections preventable by adult immunization with 15- and 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccines in the United States 92%
- Re-emergence of Invasive Pneumococcal Disease in Germany during the Spring and Summer of 2021 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.