Back

A Randomized Pilot Trial of Medically Tailored Meals and Lifestyle Support for Gestational Diabetes: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Implementation Challenges

Shields, A. D.; Waring, M. E.; Murphy, M.; Pescatello, L. S.; Chun, O. K.; Wu, H.; Sena, V.; Field, C. M.; Kearns, A. D.

2026-04-18 endocrinology
10.64898/2026.04.16.26351041 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundLifestyle interventions incorporating medically-tailored meal delivery may support rapid behavior change among pregnant individuals with gestational diabetes (GDM). PurposeTo examine the feasibility and acceptability of a multicomponent lifestyle intervention for pregnant individuals with GDM. Primary outcomes included recruitment, retention, intervention receipt, and acceptability. MethodsWe conducted a pilot randomized feasibility trial among pregnant individuals with GDM recruited from maternal fetal medicine clinics in the Hartford, Connecticut area. Participants were randomized to usual GDM care or the Meals4Moms intervention plus usual care. The intervention included medically-tailored meal delivery, personalized physical activity support, and multimodal education with digital tools. Participants completed a survey and three 24-hour dietary recalls at baseline and post-intervention. Meals4Moms participants also completed a semi-structured interview at follow-up. Intervention receipt was tracked by study staff. ResultsOf 30 individuals approached, we screened 80% (n=24), of whom 75% (n=18/24) were eligible; we randomized 8 participants. Seventy-five percent (n=6/8) completed at least one component of the follow-up assessment (100%, n=4/4 Meals4Moms, 50%, n=2/4 Usual Care). One participant spent [≥]80% of her total food budget (n=1/4, 25%), and no participants completed [≥]80% of prescribed exercise sessions (range: 0-50%). All (n=4) Meals4Moms participants reported they would be very likely to participate in the program if they had GDM again, and 100% (n=4) would be very likely to recommend the program to a friend with GDM. ConclusionsWhile the Meals4Moms intervention was highly acceptable to participants, procedural refinements are needed prior to conducting a full-scale efficacy trial.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.