Back

A Randomized Pilot Trial of Medically Tailored Meals and Lifestyle Support for Gestational Diabetes: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Implementation Challenges

Shields, A. D.; Waring, M. E.; Murphy, M.; Pescatello, L. S.; Chun, O. K.; Wu, H.; Sena, V.; Field, C. M.; Kearns, A. D.

2026-04-18 endocrinology
10.64898/2026.04.16.26351041 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Lifestyle interventions incorporating medically-tailored meal delivery may support rapid behavior change among pregnant individuals with gestational diabetes (GDM). Purpose: To examine the feasibility and acceptability of a multicomponent lifestyle intervention for pregnant individuals with GDM. Primary outcomes included recruitment, retention, intervention receipt, and acceptability. Methods: We conducted a pilot randomized feasibility trial among pregnant individuals with GDM recruited from maternal fetal medicine clinics in the Hartford, Connecticut area. Participants were randomized to usual GDM care or the Meals4Moms intervention plus usual care. The intervention included medically-tailored meal delivery, personalized physical activity support, and multimodal education with digital tools. Participants completed a survey and three 24-hour dietary recalls at baseline and post-intervention. Meals4Moms participants also completed a semi-structured interview at follow-up. Intervention receipt was tracked by study staff. Results: Of 30 individuals approached, we screened 80% (n=24), of whom 75% (n=18/24) were eligible; we randomized 8 participants. Seventy-five percent (n=6/8) completed at least one component of the follow-up assessment (100%, n=4/4 Meals4Moms, 50%, n=2/4 Usual Care). One participant spent [≥]80% of her total food budget (n=1/4, 25%), and no participants completed [≥]80% of prescribed exercise sessions (range: 0-50%). All (n=4) Meals4Moms participants reported they would be very likely to participate in the program if they had GDM again, and 100% (n=4) would be very likely to recommend the program to a friend with GDM. Conclusions: While the Meals4Moms intervention was highly acceptable to participants, procedural refinements are needed prior to conducting a full-scale efficacy trial.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
14.7%
2
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.3%
3
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
4
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
5
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
7
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
8
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.9%
9
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
10
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
11
Obesity
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
12
Molecular Metabolism
105 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
13
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
14
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
15
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
16
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
17
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
18
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
19
Diabetologia
36 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
20
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
21
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
22
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.8%
23
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
25
Diabetes Care
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
26
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%