Back

Imbalance-Aware Optimal Transport Learning for Cost-Effective Diabetic Retinopathy Screening

SHI, M.; Afolabi, S. O.

2026-04-18 ophthalmology
10.64898/2026.04.16.26351035 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDiabetic Retinopathy (DR) is one of the leading cause of vision loss and blindness. AI models have been instrumental in providing an alternative solution to real-life medical treatment which are costly and sometimes not readily available in developing and underdeveloped nations. However, most of the existing AI models are developed with high-quality clinical images that makes it difficult to use such models in low-resource settings. For this reason, this research focus on bridging this gap by developing a low-resource, mobile-friendly, and deployable deep learning (DL) model for the detection of DR using an imbalance-aware optimal transport (OT) learning approach. MethodsWe trained our proposed framework with both high-quality hospital-grade images and low-resource smartphone-acquired images, and evaluated with the original test set from the smartphone domain. We also curated three levels of smartphone image-degradation quality and reported results from multiple experiments with bootstrapping. All model evaluations were assessed using the AUC, Sensitivity, and Specificity. Our results were compared with empirical risk minimization (ERM), Prototype OT, and Sinkhorn OT methods. ResultsWe used four strong backbone architectures in the assessment. With our framework, Mobilevit-s achieved the best performance: an AUC of 87%, sensitivity of 89%, and specificity of 95%. Meanwhile, the statistical significance performance test (95% CI) shows that the AUC results are in the range of approximately 84% to 89%. For sensitivity, the range is 81% to 96%, and for specificity, 93% to 96%. This result indicated a performance increase of more than 3-5% compared to baseline methods. ConclusionOur framework shows promising results for low-resource DR screening, which has a potential to benefit less-advantaged groups and developing nations.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.