Back

Genetic confounding in the associations between maternal health and autism

Arildskov, E. S.; Ahlqvist, V. H.; Khachadourian, V.; Asgel, Z.; Schendel, D.; Hansen, S. N.; Grove, J.; Janecka, M.

2026-04-17 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.04.16.26351033 medRxiv
Show abstract

The etiology of autism is influenced by genetic and non-genetic factors, with observational studies suggesting associations between early maternal health diagnoses and offspring autism. However, these associations may partly reflect shared familial genetic liability rather than direct causal effects. Using comprehensive national health registers and individual-level genetic data from the iPSYCH cohort (N=117,542), we examined whether maternal health diagnoses are associated with offspring polygenic scores (PGS) for autism. Such associations between maternal health and offspring autism would indicate shared genetic factors and the possibility of genetic confounding in the observational associations. We also tested such associations with PGSs for other neuropsychiatric and neurodevelopmental conditions that are genetically correlated with autism, but with better-powered PGS (due to larger GWAS sample sizes and likely more polygenic genetic architecture), as well as height, a negative control. Several maternal diagnoses were nominally associated with autism PGS in the child, including, e.g., certain obstetric complications, asthma, and obesity. After adjustment for multiple testing, the only statistically significant results included those between maternal diagnoses, predominantly psychiatric, and other neuropsychiatric and neurodevelopmental PGSs in the child. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of our results across exposure windows, diagnostic settings, and socioeconomic adjustments. These findings indicate that maternal diagnoses associated with autism partially reflect shared genetic liabilities between mothers and their children. However, such genetic effects, as captured by child PGS do not fully explain the observed associations, suggesting additional factors, including e.g., non-genetic familial factors, rare variants, and indirect effects.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.9%
2
Psychological Medicine
88 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.4%
3
JCPP Advances
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
4
International Journal of Epidemiology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.1%
5
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
60 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
6
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.0%
7
The American Journal of Human Genetics
234 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
8
Molecular Psychiatry
282 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
9
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.2%
10
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
11
Translational Psychiatry
260 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
12
Twin Research and Human Genetics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
13
Nature Genetics
286 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
14
American Journal of Psychiatry
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
15
Autism Research
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
Nature Human Behaviour
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
18
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.7%
19
Human Molecular Genetics
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
20
npj Genomic Medicine
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
21
Molecular Autism
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
22
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
23
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.5%
24
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.4%
25
Wellcome Open Research
67 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
26
Nature Mental Health
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
27
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 33%
1.3%
28
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.1%
29
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
30
European Journal of Epidemiology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%