Back

Evolving concerns about the COVID-19 pandemic: A content analysis of free-text reports from the UK COVID-19 Public Experiences (COPE) study cohort over a two-year period

Phillips, R.; Wood, F.; Torrens-Burton, A.; Glennan, C.; Sellars, P.; Lowe, S.; Caffoor, A.; Hallingberg, B.; Gillespie, D.; Shepherd, V.; Poortinga, W.; Wahl-Jorgensen, K.; Williams, D.

2026-04-19 public and global health
10.64898/2026.04.16.26351013 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objectives Concerns about COVID-19 were a key driver of infection-prevention behaviour during the pandemic. The aim of this study was to gain an in-depth longitudinal understanding of the type and frequency of concerns experienced throughout the first two years of the COVID-19 pandemic. Design Content analysis of qualitative descriptions provided in a prospective longitudinal online survey as part of the COVID-19 UK Public Experiences (COPE) Study. Method At baseline (March/April 2020), when the UK entered its first national lockdown, 11,113 adults completed the COPE survey. Follow-up surveys were conducted at 3, 12, 18 and 24 months. Participants were recruited via the HealthWise Wales research registry and social media. Baseline surveys collected demographic and health data, and all waves included an open-ended question about COVID-19 concerns. Content analysis was used to identify the type and frequency of concerns at each time point. Results A total of 41,564 open-text responses were coded into six categories: personal harm (n=16,353), harm to others (n=11,464), social/economic impact (n=6,433), preventing transmission (n=4,843), government/media (n=1,048), and general concerns (n=1,423). The proportion of respondents reporting any concern declined from 75.3% at baseline to 65.8% at 24 months. Over time, concerns about personal harm increased (baseline 41.8% vs. 24-months 52.7%) whereas concerns about harm to others decreased (baseline 48.5% vs. 24-months 28.6%). Concerns about harm were also expressed in relation to clinical vulnerability, lack of trust in government/media, and perceived lack of adherence by others. These were balanced against concerns about wider social and economic impacts of restrictions. Conclusions Public concerns about COVID-19 evolved substantially over the first two years of the pandemic, reflecting changing perceptions of risk and responsibility. Monitoring concerns longitudinally is vital to help guide effective communication and behavioural interventions during future pandemics.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
18.2%
2
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
12.1%
4
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.2%
5
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
7
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
8
Palliative Medicine
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
9
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.0%
10
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
11
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
12
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
13
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
15
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
17
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
19
Public Health in Practice
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
20
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
21
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
22
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
23
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
25
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 76%
0.7%
27
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.7%
28
Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
29
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
30
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%