The Visual Hemofilter: a novel visualization technology that improves task performance among intensive care professionals: A prospective simulation study.
Bider-Lunkiewicz, J.; Gasciauskaite, G.; Rück Perez, B.; Braun, J.; Willms, J.; Szekessy, H.; Nöthiger, C.; Hoffmann, M.; Milovanovic, P.; Keller, E.; Tscholl, D. W.
Show abstract
PurposeThis study evaluates the Visual Hemofilter, a novel decision-support and information transfer tool designed to assist with regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) in hemofiltration. By representing hemofilter parameters and patient blood constituents as animated icons, the tool aims to improve clinicians interpretation of blood gas results and RCA reference tables. We hypothesized that the Visual Hemofilter would enhance clinical decision-making by enabling faster and more accurate therapy adjustments, increasing clinicians confidence in their decisions, and reducing cognitive workload compared to conventional methods. MethodsWe conducted a prospective, randomized, computer-based simulation study across four intensive care units at the University Hospital Zurich. Twenty-six critical care professionals participated, each managing regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) scenarios using either the Visual Hemofilter or conventional methods involving blood gas analysis and reference tables. Following each scenario, participants made therapy adjustments and rated their decision confidence and cognitive workload. ResultsUse of the Visual Hemofilter significantly improved decision accuracy (odds ratio [OR] 3.96; 95% CI 2.03-7.73; p < 0.0001) and reduced decision time by an average of 33 seconds (mean difference -33.3 seconds; 95% CI -39.4 to -27.2; p < 0.0001). Participants also reported greater confidence in their decisions (OR 5.41; 95% CI 2.49-11.77; p < 0.0001) and experienced lower cognitive workload (mean difference -15.05 points on the NASA-TLX scale (National Aeronautics and Space Administration-Task Load Index); 95% CI -18.99 to -11.13; p < 0.0001). ConclusionsThe Visual Hemofilter enhances clinical decision-making in RCA by increasing accuracy and speed, boosting decision confidence, and reducing cognitive workload. This technology has the potential to reduce errors and better support critical care professionals in managing complex treatment scenarios.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk Factors for Early PICC Removal: A Retrospective Study of Adult Inpatients at an Academic Medical Center 94%
- SpO 2 /FiO 2 Ratio as a Better Metric for Assessment of RBC Transfusion Effectiveness in Non-traumatic Critically Ill Patients with Physiologic Derangements 93%
- ChatGPT Provides Inconsistent Risk-Stratification of Patients With Atraumatic Chest Pain 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Utility of skin tone on pulse oximetry in critically ill patients: a prospective cohort study 92%
- ABCDEF Bundle Implementation: The influence of access to bundle-enhancing supplies and equipment 92%
- A Multicenter Evaluation of Blood Purification with Seraph 100 Microbind Affinity Blood Filter for the Treatment of Severe COVID-19: A Preliminary Report 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Chronic Hemodialysis Patients have better outcomes with COVID-19 - a retrospective cohort study 93%
- Hospitalist perspectives of available tests to monitor volume status in patients with heart failure: a qualitative study 92%
- Comparison of in-hospital mortality and clinical outcomes among patients greater than and less than 80 years undergoing TAVR 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Simple ventilators for emergency use based on Bag-Valve pressing systems: Lessons learned and future steps 92%
- Evaluating the Utility of UV Lamps to Mitigate the Spread of Pathogens in the ICU 91%
- An image processing protocol to extract variables predictive of human embryo fitness for assisted reproduction 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance of digital Early Warning Score (NEWS2) in a cardiac specialist setting: retrospective cohort study 93%
- Assessing the Safety of Home Oximetry for Covid-19: A multi-site retrospective observational study 93%
- Exploring Associations with Severe Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure in COVID-19 Patients upon Admission: A Model for Severe Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure in 329 Unvaccinated, Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.