Back

The Visual Hemofilter: a novel visualization technology that improves task performance among intensive care professionals: A prospective simulation study.

Bider-Lunkiewicz, J.; Gasciauskaite, G.; Rück Perez, B.; Braun, J.; Willms, J.; Szekessy, H.; Nöthiger, C.; Hoffmann, M.; Milovanovic, P.; Keller, E.; Tscholl, D. W.

2026-04-20 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.64898/2026.04.16.26351012 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeThis study evaluates the Visual Hemofilter, a novel decision-support and information transfer tool designed to assist with regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) in hemofiltration. By representing hemofilter parameters and patient blood constituents as animated icons, the tool aims to improve clinicians interpretation of blood gas results and RCA reference tables. We hypothesized that the Visual Hemofilter would enhance clinical decision-making by enabling faster and more accurate therapy adjustments, increasing clinicians confidence in their decisions, and reducing cognitive workload compared to conventional methods. MethodsWe conducted a prospective, randomized, computer-based simulation study across four intensive care units at the University Hospital Zurich. Twenty-six critical care professionals participated, each managing regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) scenarios using either the Visual Hemofilter or conventional methods involving blood gas analysis and reference tables. Following each scenario, participants made therapy adjustments and rated their decision confidence and cognitive workload. ResultsUse of the Visual Hemofilter significantly improved decision accuracy (odds ratio [OR] 3.96; 95% CI 2.03-7.73; p < 0.0001) and reduced decision time by an average of 33 seconds (mean difference -33.3 seconds; 95% CI -39.4 to -27.2; p < 0.0001). Participants also reported greater confidence in their decisions (OR 5.41; 95% CI 2.49-11.77; p < 0.0001) and experienced lower cognitive workload (mean difference -15.05 points on the NASA-TLX scale (National Aeronautics and Space Administration-Task Load Index); 95% CI -18.99 to -11.13; p < 0.0001). ConclusionsThe Visual Hemofilter enhances clinical decision-making in RCA by increasing accuracy and speed, boosting decision confidence, and reducing cognitive workload. This technology has the potential to reduce errors and better support critical care professionals in managing complex treatment scenarios.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 6%
22.8%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.6%
3
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.9%
4
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
5
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
6
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
9
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
10
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.5%
11
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.8%
12
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
13
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
15
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Physics of Fluids
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
17
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.2%
19
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
20
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
21
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
22
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
23
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
24
npj Microgravity
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
25
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
26
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
27
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
28
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
30
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%