Back

CDK4/6 inhibitors enhance oxaliplatin efficacy in colorectal cancer with RB-dependent and tumor-selective activity in intestinal model

Souza, A. S. O.; Conceicao, J. S. M.; Ferraz, L. S.; Delou, J. M. A.; Miranda, B. R.; Verissimo, C.; Carneiro, M. S. C.; Rehen, S.; Bonamino, M. H.; Borges, H. L.

2026-04-19 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.04.15.718743 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Although the retinoblastoma protein (pRB) is functionally inactivated by hyperphosphorylation in the majority of colorectal cancers (CRC) - with RB1 rarely mutated and even amplified at the genomic level - three critical gaps remain unaddressed: no study has systematically compared which first-line chemotherapeutic agent best synergizes with CDK4/6 inhibition using head-to-head quantitative analysis; functional differences between palbociclib and abemaciclib in chemotherapy combinations have not been characterized in CRC; and direct genetic evidence of RB dependency in this combinatorial context is lacking. Here, we addressed these gaps by evaluating palbociclib and abemaciclib combined with oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and SN-38 in HCT116 CRC cells, with validation in SW480 cells, RB1-silenced HCT116 cells (shRNA-RB), and non-tumoral intestinal epithelial cells (IEC-6), using quantitative drug interaction analysis (Chou-Talalay), cell cycle profiling, apoptosis assessment, and pRB phosphorylation measurement. Oxaliplatin was the most consistently synergistic partner for both CDK4/6 inhibitors (CI < 1 across all tested concentrations), while combinations with SN-38 yielded variable results and 5-FU combinations approached additivity. The oxaliplatin combination reinforced G1 arrest and enhanced cell death, with abemaciclib producing more pronounced apoptotic induction than palbociclib - an effect not explained by differential pRB target engagement (both inhibitors reduced pRB Ser807/811 phosphorylation by [~]50%), likely reflecting abemaciclibs broader kinase inhibitory profile. shRNA-mediated RB1 silencing partially attenuated the combinatorial effect, providing direct genetic evidence that the synergy is RB-dependent. Importantly, the combination did not significantly potentiate oxaliplatin cytotoxicity in non-tumoral IEC-6 intestinal epithelial cells, in contrast to the pronounced enhancement observed in tumor cells, and synergistic benefit was preserved at sub-cytotoxic inhibitor concentrations. These findings identify oxaliplatin as the optimal chemotherapeutic partner for CDK4/6 inhibition in CRC, with a mechanism involving RB-dependent potentiation of apoptosis that is preferentially active against tumor cells and maintained at clinically relevant inhibitor doses.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.2%
2
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
3
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.8%
5
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.3%
6
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
9
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
10
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
11
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
13
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
16
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
17
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
18
Oncogene
76 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
19
Neoplasia
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
20
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Translational Oncology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
23
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
Clinical and Translational Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Cell Death & Disease
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.7%
27
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.7%
28
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.6%
29
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.6%