Back

Direct Assessment of Short-Latency Intracortical Inhibition via Immediate TMS-Evoked Potentials

Christiansen, L.; Song, Y.; Haagerup, D.; Beck, M. M.; Montemagno, K. T.; Rothwell, J.; Siebner, H. R.

2026-04-20 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.04.15.718740 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) is the most widely used neurophysiological index of GABAergic inhibition in the human cortex. However, it is an indirect measure, inferring synaptic inhibition from suppression of peripherally recorded motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). In the standard protocol, a subthreshold conditioning pulse suppresses the MEP evoked by a suprathreshold test pulse delivered 1-5 ms later. Interpretation is further complicated by temporal overlap with short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF), reflecting excitatory interactions at interstimulus intervals of [~]1.5 and 2.7 ms. To overcome these limitations, we recorded immediate TMS-evoked EEG potentials (iTEPs; 1-10 ms post-stimulus) as a more direct measure of motor cortical activity in 16 healthy volunteers (20-35 years; 7 male). The conventional SICI protocol suppressed only later components of the iTEP, likely corresponding to late corticospinal volleys previously identified in epidural spinal recordings after suprathreshold TMS, while the earliest iTEP component was unaffected. Importantly, later iTEPs were suppressed to a similar extent whether conditioning-test intervals coincided with SICF peaks or troughs, and the magnitude of iTEP suppression correlated with concurrently recorded paired-pulse MEP suppression. SICI also reduced an early TEP component (N15; 10-20 ms), but paired-pulse N15 suppression showed a different dependence on stimulus intensity and did not correlate with MEP suppression. These findings demonstrate that SICI measured via MEPs does not reflect a global index of cortical GABAergic motor cortical inhibition but instead reflects inhibition within specific cortical circuits that can be investigated directly with iTEPs.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 3%
14.2%
2
Clinical Neurophysiology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.1%
3
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 1%
8.1%
4
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.8%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 17%
4.8%
6
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
7
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
8
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
10
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
11
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
12
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.9%
13
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
14
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
15
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.9%
16
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.8%
17
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
18
Pain
70 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
19
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
20
Neuroscience Letters
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
21
Progress in Neurobiology
41 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
22
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
23
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.1%
24
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
25
The Cerebellum
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
26
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
28
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
29
Journal of Neurotrauma
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
30
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%