Task demands dynamically structure feature selection, routing, and integration in the human brain
Yan, Y.; Zhan, J.; Duan, Y.; Garrod, O.; Ince, R.; Zhou, C.; Jack, R.; Schyns, P. G.
Show abstract
AbstractFlexible visual categorization requires selecting task-relevant information from complex stimuli and transforming it through structured computations. Yet how task demands flexibly control these computations in the human brain remains unresolved. Dynamic faces provide a powerful test case, conveying stable identity through 3D shape and transient emotional expression through 4D movement. Using generative 4D face modelling, participant-specific MEG (N = 24), and information-theoretic analyses, we show that the brain implements a structured processing architecture. Task relevance first gates feature representations in occipital cortex, selectively sustaining relevant features while suppressing irrelevant ones. These features are then routed along pathway-specific channels--3D identity features to the ventral pathway and 4D emotion features to the lateral pathway. Finally, these inputs converge in temporal cortex, where identity and emotion features are synergistically integrated for learned identities. These results show how task demands dynamically structure feature selection, gating, routing, and integration, thereby constraining the computations that support flexible categorization.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Confirmation Bias through Selective Readout of Information Encoded in Human Parietal Cortex 97%
- Dynamically shifting from compositional to conjunctive brain representations supports cognitive task learning 96%
- Differential spatial computations in ventral and lateral face-selective regions are scaffolded by structural connections 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.