Back

A standardized framework resolves ambiguity in motor neuron loss across neurodegenerative diseases

Sowoidnich, L.; Norman, A. L.; Gerstner, F.; Siemund, J. K.; Buettner, J. M.; Pagiazitis, J. G.; Dreilich, V.; Pilz, K.; Tian, D.; Sumner, C. J.; Paradis, A.; Mentis, G. Z.; Simon, C. M.

2026-04-20 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.04.15.718647 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Motor neuron (MN) loss is a hallmark of neurodegenerative disorders, yet its assessment remains variable, confounding mechanistic and therapeutic interpretation. To address this, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) mouse studies, revealing 60% variability in reported MN loss, largely attributable to nonspecific spinal cord sampling. Using a whole-segment approach with tissue clearing, MN tracing, and multimodal imaging, we confirmed segment-dependent differences in MN counts. Common MN markers (SMI-32, Nissl) lacked specificity, whereas choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) provided robust labeling in murine and human spinal cords. Deep learning-based whole-mount segmentation enabled unbiased MN quantification and validated manual counts. Integrating analysis with computational modeling established segment sampling as a key driver of variability and revealed degeneration patterns: widespread MN loss in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), selective MN loss in severe SMA, and preservation in mild SMA models. These findings establish a framework for reproducible MN quantification. HighlightsO_LISpinal cord segment-specific analysis reduces variability and allows accurate MN quantification C_LIO_LIChAT is the most reliable MN marker in murine and human spinal cords C_LIO_LIDeep learning-based segmentation enables unbiased MN quantification in intact spinal cords C_LIO_LIMN degeneration is widespread in ALS but restricted to pools innervating proximal muscles in severe SMA C_LI

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Acta Neuropathologica
51 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.9%
2
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
14.6%
3
Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
4
Acta Neuropathologica Communications
81 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.7%
7
npj Parkinson's Disease
89 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.7%
8
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
9
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
10
Experimental Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
11
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Movement Disorders
62 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
13
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.7%
14
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
15
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.2%
17
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
18
Molecular Therapy
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
19
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.9%
20
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 53%
0.9%
22
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
25
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%
26
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.5%