Back

Robustness to noise reveals cross-culturally consistent properties of pitch perception for harmonic and inharmonic sounds

McPherson-McNato, M.; Undurraga, E.; Seidle, A.; Honeycutt, O.; McDermott, J. H.

2026-04-16 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.04.15.716223 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Pitch is a building block of speech and music, but the extent to which pitch perception is shared across cultures is unclear. Evidence from Western participants suggests that pitch perception relies on multiple representations. For instance, harmonic tones are easier to discriminate in noise than inharmonic tones despite comparable discrimination in quiet, suggesting that different representations are used in noise and quiet. We tested whether these effects are present cross-culturally, comparing participants from the US and a Bolivian Amazonian Indigenous community (Tsimane). Participants heard two-note melodies and reproduced the melody by singing. Tones were either harmonic or inharmonic and were presented in noise or quiet. Both groups exhibited two characteristics of pitch perception previously seen in US listeners: the direction of pitch changes could be reproduced with equal accuracy for harmonic and inharmonic tones in quiet but was better for harmonic than inharmonic tones in noise. However, replicating previous work, Tsimane vocal reproductions were much less likely to be related to the absolute pitch or chroma of the stimulus notes, differing from the tendency seen in Western participants to match pitch and/or chroma. Pitch and chroma matching behavior were more prominent in a subset of Tsimane whose responses to a demographic survey suggested greater integration with global and Bolivian markets and culture. The results demonstrate that the basic structure of pitch perception is shared across cultures despite other differences in pitch-related behavior that are plausibly driven by culture-specific experience.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.2%
2
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
12.4%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 10%
8.2%
4
Cognition
44 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.2%
7
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.0%
8
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.8%
9
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
10
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 27%
2.3%
11
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.0%
12
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
13
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.8%
14
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
16
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
17
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.7%
18
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
20
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
21
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
22
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
23
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
Trends in Hearing
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
25
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.7%
26
Developmental Science
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
27
Hearing Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
28
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.6%