Back

Spatial remodeling of the urothelial carcinoma tumor microenvironment shapes response to neoadjuvant atezolizumab

Nameki, R.; Kinong, J.; Huang, C.-H.; Saul, M.; Sur, A.; Schmidt, A.; Kozar-gillan, N.; Lauturnus, S.; Tekman, M.; Trageser, A.; Yang, W.; Chawla, D.; Gonzalo, A.; Mehta, S. M.; Krupar, R.; Boehm, C.; Pezer, M.; Lin, G. H. Y.; Fernandez, D.; Pierceall, W. E.; Bienkowska, J. R.; Szeto, G. L.; Davis, C. B.; Powles, T.; Ching, K.

2026-04-20 oncology
10.64898/2026.04.15.26350980 medRxiv
Show abstract

The ABACUS study was a single arm, phase II trial evaluating neoadjuvant atezolizumab in operable urothelial carcinoma. Initial bulk transcriptomic and immunohistochemistry analyses suggested links between immune activation, tissue remodeling, and resistance pathways such as transforming growth factor {beta} that were associated with clinical outcome. To further characterize spatial and phenotypic changes at high resolution, artificial intelligence-assisted digital image analysis of hematoxylin and eosin sections and spatial transcriptomics were performed on paired tissue samples. In baseline samples, cells residing in lymphoid aggregates and tertiary lymphoid structures were more abundant in stable disease than in relapse and exhibited gene expression programs associated with improved survival in urothelial carcinoma. Most spatial features reflected shared pharmacodynamic changes between stable disease and relapse; however, carcinoma-endothelial adjacency was reduced significantly following treatment and differed between groups, accompanied by distinct transcriptional programs. Together, these findings indicate that atezolizumab induces localized immune and stromal remodeling within the tumor microenvironment, while non-response despite immune expansion is associated with persistent spatial immune exclusion and carcinoma-endothelial adjacency. Spatial and phenotypic biomarkers identified here may inform rational combination strategies for immune checkpoint inhibitor-refractory urothelial carcinoma.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.3%
2
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
3
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
4
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.2%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.9%
7
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 34%
2.3%
9
Cancer Immunology Research
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
10
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
11
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
13
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
14
Journal of Hematology & Oncology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
15
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
16
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
18
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
19
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
Oncogene
76 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.9%
22
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
23
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.8%
24
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
25
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
26
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
27
Molecular Cancer Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
28
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
29
OncoImmunology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
30
The Journal of Immunology
146 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%