Maternal health and autism risk: parsing direct and indirect genetic effects using 3-generation family linkage
Arildskov, E. S.; Khachadourian, V.; Grove, J.; Schendel, D.; Hansen, S. N.; Janecka, M.
Show abstract
Despite autisms prominent genetic etiology and early-life origins, parsing genetic effects contributing to the condition into those that operate directly (via allelic transmission to offspring) vs. indirectly (via influencing prenatal environment) remains challenging. We examined this using a novel design leveraging 3-generation family linkage in Danish national registers. The cohort included all children born in Denmark from 1998-2015 and their relatives identified through 3-generation family linkage. The analytic sample comprised full maternal cousin pairs, including parallel (children of mothers sister) and cross cousins (children of mothers brother). Exposures were diagnoses in the index mother previously associated with offspring autism; the outcome was autism diagnosis in cousins of the index child. We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate associations separately in parallel and cross cousins, followed by comparisons of these hazard ratios to infer mechanisms. Several maternal diagnoses (e.g., postpartum hemorrhage, personality disorders, epilepsy) were associated with autism in both parallel and cross cousins, consistent with shared direct genetic effects. Other conditions (e.g., false labor, recurrent major depressive disorder, other anxiety disorders, systemic connective tissue involvement) showed stronger associations in parallel than cross cousins, supporting additional indirect genetic effects operating through the prenatal environment. Adjustment for the same diagnosis in the cousins own mother did not substantially change estimates, providing no evidence for an additional role of non-genetic mechanisms associated with the diagnosis. These findings suggest that both direct and indirect genetic effects contribute to observed links between maternal health and offspring autism, highlighting etiologic heterogeneity and highlighting a registry-based family design to separate these pathways without genetic data.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating the impact of transmitted and non-transmitted psychiatric and neurodevelopmental polygenic scores on youth emotional problems 95%
- Genetic neurodevelopmental clustering and dyslexia 94%
- Using twin-pairs to assess potential bias in polygenic prediction of externalising behaviours across development 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Neonatal levels of acute phase proteins and risk of autism spectrum disorders 94%
- Examining sex-differentiated genetic effects across neuropsychiatric and behavioral traits 93%
- Investigating direct and indirect genetic effects in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) using parent-offspring trios 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comorbidities in autism spectrum disorder and their etiologies 96%
- Maternal Levels of Acute Phase Proteins in Early Pregnancy and Risk of Autism Spectrum Disorders in Offspring 95%
- Clinical autism subscales have common genetic liability that is heritable, pleiotropic, and generalizable to the general population 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Autism heterogeneity related to preterm birth: multi-ancestry results from the SPARK sample 94%
- Examining Differences in the Genetic and Functional Architecture of ADHD Diagnosed in Childhood and Adulthood 94%
- Dimensional gender diversity is associated with greater polygenic propensity for cognitive performance and interacts with other genetic factors in predicting health outcomes 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity in early neurodevelopmental traits in the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study 94%
- Characterizing Genetic Pathways Unique to Autism Spectrum Disorder at Multiple Levels of Biological Analysis 93%
- A 3D approach to understanding heterogeneity in early developing autisms 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.